Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document C2006/165/32

    Case C-211/06P: Appeal brought on 9 May 2006 by Herta Adam against the judgment delivered on 22 February 2006 by the Court of First Instance (First Chamber) in Case T-342/04 Herta Adam v Commission of the European Communities

    OJ C 165, 15.7.2006, p. 18–18 (ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, NL, PL, PT, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    15.7.2006   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 165/18

    Appeal brought on 9 May 2006 by Herta Adam against the judgment delivered on 22 February 2006 by the Court of First Instance (First Chamber) in Case T-342/04 Herta Adam v Commission of the European Communities

    (Case C-211/06P)

    (2006/C 165/32)

    Language of the case: French

    Parties

    Appellant:Herta Adam (represented by: S. Orlandi, A. Coolen, J.-N Louis, E. Marchal, lawyers)

    Other party to the proceedings: Commission of the European Communities

    Form of order sought

    —

    Set aside the judgment of the Court of First Instance (First Chamber) of 22 February 2006 in Case T-342 Herta Adam v Commission of the European Communities in its entirety;

    —

    Annul the Commission's decision of 22 September 2003 refusing the applicant the benefit of the expatriation allowance provided for by Article 4 of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations of officials of the European Communities;

    —

    Order the defendant to pay the costs of appeal and at first instance.

    Pleas in law and main arguments

    The appeal is based on the allegation that the Court of First Instance erred in law in interpreting the concept of ‘circumstances arising from work done for another State’ set out in the second indent of Article 4(1)(a) of Annex VII of the Staff Regulations.

    Top