Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 92003E001715

WRITTEN QUESTION E-1715/03 by Pasqualina Napoletano (PSE) to the Commission. Transposition into national law and application of Directive 93/104/EC.

OJ C 280E, 21.11.2003, pp. 177–178 (ES, DA, DE, EL, EN, FR, IT, NL, PT, FI, SV)

European Parliament's website

92003E1715

WRITTEN QUESTION E-1715/03 by Pasqualina Napoletano (PSE) to the Commission. Transposition into national law and application of Directive 93/104/EC.

Official Journal 280 E , 21/11/2003 P. 0177 - 0178


WRITTEN QUESTION E-1715/03

by Pasqualina Napoletano (PSE) to the Commission

(23 May 2003)

Subject: Transposition into national law and application of Directive 93/104/EC

Council Directive No 93/104/EC(1) concerning certain aspects of the organisation of working time, along with its amending Directive 2000/34/EC(2), have recently been transposed into Italian national law through Decree Law No 66 of 14 April 2003, published in Official Gazette of the Italian Republic No 87 of 14 April 2003. It appears that in Italy the category caretakers and janitors is not considered to fall within the scope of the EU directive on working time. This is because Royal Decree No 692 of 15 March 1923, which is still in force, states that discontinuous and passive types of work do not qualify as sustained and uninterrupted employment.

Today, 80 years later, that contention seems meaningless in the light of the fact that the duties that caretakers and janitors are expected to perform almost always call for constant attentiveness. This theory is supported by recent Court of Justice case-law concerning doctors in Spain, which treats periods of availability as working time when such periods presuppose physical and mental vigilance on the part of a worker present at the workplace.

The fact is, however, that in Italy certain categories of caretaker and janitor work up to 59 hours a week, and up to a maximum of 11 consecutive hours per day. Moreover, it is often the case that the relevant national collective agreements contain no reference to length of work. This too runs contrary to the directive, which establishes that all workers have the right to know their working time.

The aim of the European working time directives is to implement the Charter of Fundamental Social Rights of Workers, and they have as their legal basis the articles of the Treaty relating to the improvement of the health and safety of all workers.

The European Parliament has already highlighted the problems associated with the definition of working time provided in Directive 93/104/EEC in its report A5-0010/2002(3), which was adopted in February 2002, and which also emphasised that reference to national laws could give rise to grave risks of distortions and disparities between Member States.

Does the Commission consider the exclusion of caretakers and janitors from the scope of this directive to be justified?

How will it remedy the problems that have been encountered with regard to the definition of working time when undertaking its forthcoming, eagerly-awaited and urgent review of Directive 93/104/EC?

(1) OJ L 307, 13.12.1993, p. 18.

(2) OJ L 195, 1.8.2000, p. 41.

(3) OJ C 284 E, 21.11.2002, p. 362.

Answer given by Mrs Diamantopoulou on behalf of the Commission

(23 June 2003)

Directive 93/104/EC(1) lays down minimum safety and health requirements for the organisation of working time. According to Article 1(3) of this Directive, it applies to all sectors of activity, both public and private, within the meaning of Article 2 of Directive 89/391/EEC, without prejudice to Article 17 of this Directive, with the exception of air, rail, road, sea, inland waterway and lake transport, sea fishing, other work at sea and the activities of doctors in training. The sectors and activities excluded from Directive 93/104/EC are now covered by Directive 2000/34/EC(2), which Member States must transpose into national law by 1 August 2003 (1 August 2004 for doctors in training).

The exclusion from the scope of the Directive of workers other than those expressly mentioned in the Article above would not be in compliance with the Directive.

The new Italian legislation(3) is currently being examined in order to determine whether it complies with the Directive.

With regard to the second question, the Commission intends to address the definition of working time, particularly in the light of the case-law of the Court of Justice, in the communication on working time which will be adopted in the course of this year.

(1) Council Directive 93/104/EC of 23 November 1993 concerning certain aspects of the organisation of working time OJ L 307, 13.12.1993.

(2) Directive 2000/34/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 June 2000 amending Council Directive 93/104/EC concerning certain aspects of the organisation of working time to cover sectors and activities excluded from that Directive, OJ L 195, 1.8.2000.

(3) Forwarded to the Commission by letter dated 14 April 2003.

Top