Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 92002E001611

WRITTEN QUESTION E-1611/02 by Pernille Frahm (GUE/NGL) to the Commission. State aid to agriculture.

OJ C 28E, 6.2.2003, p. 124–124 (ES, DA, DE, EL, EN, FR, IT, NL, PT, FI, SV)

European Parliament's website​

92002E1611

WRITTEN QUESTION E-1611/02 by Pernille Frahm (GUE/NGL) to the Commission. State aid to agriculture.

Official Journal 028 E , 06/02/2003 P. 0124 - 0124


WRITTEN QUESTION E-1611/02

by Pernille Frahm (GUE/NGL) to the Commission

(5 June 2002)

Subject: State aid to agriculture

I thank the Commission for its answer to question P-0744/02(1). Once it has concluded its deliberations concerning the possible revocation of the Council's decision on the destruction of wine, will the Commission inform me of the outcome of those deliberations, the background to that outcome and the basis in the Treaties for its decision?

(1) OJ C 205 E, 29.8.2002, p. 210.

Answer given by Mr Fischler on behalf of the Commission

(4 July 2002)

The Commission decided on 9 April not to ask the Court of Justice to quash the Council's decisions of 28 February 2002 on behalf of French and Italian winegrowers.

The Commission will continue to voice its disapproval of such Council decisions. But after analysing those in question in the light of previous Court findings relating to the matter it considered, given the costs and risks involved, that referral would be inopportune.

Top