This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 32007R0414
Commission Regulation (EC) No 414/2007 of 13 March 2007 concerning the technical guidelines for the planning, implementation and operational use of river information services (RIS) referred to in Article 5 of Directive 2005/44/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on harmonised river information services (RIS) on inland waterways in the Community
Commission Regulation (EC) No 414/2007 of 13 March 2007 concerning the technical guidelines for the planning, implementation and operational use of river information services (RIS) referred to in Article 5 of Directive 2005/44/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on harmonised river information services (RIS) on inland waterways in the Community
Commission Regulation (EC) No 414/2007 of 13 March 2007 concerning the technical guidelines for the planning, implementation and operational use of river information services (RIS) referred to in Article 5 of Directive 2005/44/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on harmonised river information services (RIS) on inland waterways in the Community
OJ L 105, 23.4.2007, p. 1–34
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV) This document has been published in a special edition(s)
(HR)
OJ L 327M, 5.12.2008, p. 992–1040
(MT)
In force
23.4.2007 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
L 105/1 |
COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 414/2007
of 13 March 2007
concerning the technical guidelines for the planning, implementation and operational use of river information services (RIS) referred to in Article 5 of Directive 2005/44/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on harmonised river information services (RIS) on inland waterways in the Community
THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,
Having regard to Directive 2005/44/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 September 2005 on harmonised river information services (RIS) on inland waterways in the Community (1), and in particular Article 5 thereof,
Whereas:
(1) |
In accordance with Article 1 of Directive 2005/44/EC, river information services (RIS) shall be developed and implemented in a harmonised, interoperable and open way. |
(2) |
In accordance with Article 5 of Directive 2005/44/EC, technical guidelines for the planning, implementation and operational use of river information services (RIS), hereafter referred to as RIS guidelines, shall be defined. |
(3) |
The RIS guidelines shall be based on the technical principles set out in Annex II to the Directive. |
(4) |
In accordance with Article 1(2) of Directive 2005/44/EC, the RIS guidelines shall take due account of the work carried out by relevant international organisations such as PIANC, CCNR and UNECE. Continuity shall be ensured with other modal traffic management services, in particular maritime vessel traffic management and information services. |
(5) |
In order to ensure a mutual understanding regarding the planning, implementation and operational use of RIS, the terms and definitions given in these RIS guidelines shall be used in further standardisation work and in application design. |
(6) |
The RIS architecture given in these guidelines shall be applied when developing services, systems and applications. |
(7) |
In planning RIS, a systematic procedure as described in these RIS Guidelines shall be followed. |
(8) |
The guidelines, which are the subject of this Regulation, correspond to the current technical state of the art. Experiences gained from the application of Directive 2005/44/EC as well as future technical progress may make it necessary to amend the guidelines in accordance with Article 5(2) of Directive 2005/44/EC. |
(9) |
The draft RIS guidelines have been examined by the Committee referred to in Article 11 of Directive 2005/44/EC. |
(10) |
The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee referred to in Article 11 of Directive 2005/44/EC. |
HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:
Article 1
This Regulation defines guidelines for the planning, implementation and operational use of river information services (RIS). The guidelines are set out in the Annex to this Regulation.
Article 2
This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.
This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Brussels, 13 March 2007.
For the Commission
Jacques BARROT
Vice-President
ANNEX
RIS guidelines
CONTENTS
1. |
Introduction | 6 |
2. |
Definitions | 7 |
2.1. |
River information services (RIS) | 7 |
2.2. |
RIS system | 7 |
2.3. |
RIS area | 8 |
2.4. |
RIS centre | 8 |
2.5. |
Inland VTS | 8 |
2.6. |
VTS area | 8 |
2.7. |
VTS centre | 9 |
2.8. |
Competent authority | 9 |
2.9. |
RIS authority | 9 |
2.10. |
RIS users | 9 |
2.11. |
Levels of RIS information | 9 |
2.12. |
Vessel tracking and tracing | 9 |
3. |
Participating vessels | 10 |
4. |
RIS architecture | 10 |
4.1. |
General | 10 |
4.2. |
RIS stakeholders | 11 |
4.2.1. |
Policy makers | 11 |
4.2.2. |
Regional managers | 11 |
4.2.3. |
System engineers | 11 |
4.2.4. |
Service providers | 12 |
4.2.5. |
RIS users | 12 |
4.3. |
RIS objectives | 12 |
4.4. |
RIS tasks | 12 |
4.5. |
River information services | 15 |
4.6. |
RIS functions and information needs | 16 |
4.7. |
RIS applications | 20 |
4.8. |
RIS systems | 20 |
5. |
Recommendations for individual services | 21 |
5.1. |
Fairway information service (FIS) | 21 |
5.1.1. |
General | 21 |
5.1.2. |
Radiotelephone service on inland waterways | 21 |
5.1.3. |
Internet service | 22 |
5.1.4. |
Electronic navigational chart service (Inland ECDIS) | 23 |
5.2. |
Traffic information service | 23 |
5.2.1. |
General | 23 |
5.2.2. |
Tactical traffic information (TTI) | 23 |
5.2.3. |
Strategic traffic information (STI) | 24 |
5.3. |
Traffic management | 25 |
5.3.1. |
Local traffic management (vessel traffic services — VTS) | 25 |
5.3.2. |
Navigational support | 26 |
5.3.3. |
Lock and bridge management | 26 |
5.4. |
Calamity abatement support | 26 |
5.5. |
Information for transport logistics | 27 |
5.6. |
Information for law enforcement | 28 |
6. |
Planning of RIS | 28 |
6.1. |
General | 28 |
6.2. |
Responsibilities | 28 |
6.3. |
Liability | 29 |
6.4. |
Planning process | 29 |
6.5. |
Training | 30 |
7. |
Stepwise development of RIS | 30 |
8. |
RIS standardisation procedures | 32 |
Appendix: Example of an information processing loop to Chapter 4.4 | 34 |
ABBREVIATIONS
ADNR |
Accord européen relative au transport international des marchandises dangereuses par voie de navigation intérieur du Rhin |
AIS |
Automatic identification system (transponder) |
ARGO |
Advanced river navigation |
AVV |
Adviesdienst Verkeer en Vervoer (The Netherlands) |
BICS |
Binnenvaart informatie en communicatie systeem (electronic reporting system) |
CAS |
Calamity abatement support |
CCNR |
Central Commission for the Navigation on the Rhine |
CCTV |
Closed circuit television |
CEVNI |
Code européen de voies de la navigation intérieure (European code for inland waterways), edited by UN/ECE |
COMPRIS |
Consortium operational management platform river information services (R&D project of the EU, 2003 — 2005) |
D4D |
Data warehouse for the River Danube |
DGPS |
Differential global positioning system |
ECDIS |
Electronic chart and display information system |
ECE |
Economic Commission for Europe of the United Nations |
EDI |
Electronic data interchange |
EDIFACT |
Electronic data interchange for administration, commerce and transport (UN/ECE Standard) |
ENC |
Electronic navigational chart |
ETA |
Estimated time of arrival |
ETD |
Estimated time of departure |
ETSI |
European Telecommunications Standards Institute |
FI |
Fairway information |
FIS |
Fairway information service |
GLONASS |
Global orbiting navigation satellite system |
GNSS |
Global navigation satellite system |
GSM |
Global system for mobile communication |
HF |
High frequency |
HS Code |
Harmonised commodity description and coding system of WCO |
IALA |
International Organisation of Marine Aids to Navigation and Lighthouse Authorities |
IEC |
International Electrotechnical Commission |
IHO |
International Hydrographic Organisation |
IMDG Code |
International maritime dangerous goods code |
IMO |
International Maritime Organisation |
INDRIS |
Inland navigation demonstrator of river information services (R&D project of EU, 1998–2000) |
ISO |
International Standardisation Organisation |
IT |
Information technology |
ITU |
International Telecommunication Union |
LAN |
Local area network |
LBM |
Lock and bridge management |
OFS |
Official ship number |
PIANC |
International Navigation Association |
PTM |
Port and terminal management |
RIS |
River information services |
RTA |
Required time of arrival |
SAR |
Search and rescue |
SIGNI |
Signs and signals on inland waterways, edited by UN/ECE |
SMS |
Short message service |
SOLAS |
International Convention on Safety of Life at Sea |
SOTDMA AIS |
Self organising time division multiple access AIS |
STI |
Strategic traffic information (image) |
TCP/IP |
Transmission control protocol/Internet protocol |
TI |
Traffic information |
TTI |
Tactical traffic information (image) |
UMTS |
Universal mobile telecommunication system |
UTC |
Universal time coordinated |
VDL |
VHF data link |
VHF |
Very high frequency |
VTC |
Vessel traffic centre |
VTMIS |
Vessel traffic management and information services (maritime navigation) |
VTS |
Vessel traffic services |
WAP |
Wireless application protocol |
WCO |
World Customs Organisation |
WI-FI |
Wireless fidelity |
ZKR/CCNR |
Zentralkommission für die Rheinschifffahrt |
FIGURES
Figure 2.3. |
Relation between RIS area and VTS area |
Figure 4.1. |
RIS development and redesign |
Figure 4.4a. |
Arenas roles and management tasks in inland shipping |
Figure 4.4c. |
Elements of an information processing loop |
Figure 4.4d. |
Information processing loop |
TABLES
Table 4.4b. |
Derivation of RIS services |
Table 4.5. |
River information services |
Table 4.6. |
Functional decomposition of river information services |
Table 4.8. |
Relation between services and systems |
Table 5.2.3. |
Data set for ship reporting |
Table 6.4. |
The planning process for RIS |
Table 7. |
Possible stepwise development of the different parts of RIS |
1. INTRODUCTION
(1) |
The RIS guidelines describe the principles and general requirements for planning, implementing and operational use of river information services and related systems. |
(2) |
They are equally applicable to the traffic of cargo vessels, passenger vessels and pleasure craft. |
(3) |
They should be used in conjunction with international regulations, recommendations and guidelines, such as:
|
(4) |
A number of concepts and standardisation proposals for river information services have been developed in the research and development project INDRIS of the European Union (2). These are:
|
(5) |
The concept for Inland ECDIS has been developed in the German ARGO (3) project in cooperation with INDRIS. |
(6) |
The concept for a RIS architecture has been developed by the WATERMAN (4) thematic network, an action under the Fifth Framework Programme for Research and Technological Development of the EU in the fields of VTMIS (maritime navigation) and RIS. Using these achievements, the RIS architecture has been elaborated comprehensively and in detail in the research and development project COMPRIS (5) of the European Union in 2003. |
(7) |
When reference is made in this document to Inland ECDIS (and electronic navigational charts), Inland AIS (or vessel tracking and tracing systems in general), electronic ship reporting and notices to skippers, the technical specifications as defined under the RIS Directive are meant. |
2. DEFINITIONS
The following terms are used in connection with river information services in these RIS Guidelines (see also some specific definitions in Chapters 4 and 5).
2.1. River information services (RIS)
River information services means harmonised information services to support traffic and transport management in inland navigation, including, wherever technically feasible interfaces to other transport modes. RIS aim at contributing to a safe and efficient transport process and at utilising the inland waterways to their fullest extent. RIS are already in operation in manifold ways.
Explanatory notes:
(1) |
RIS include interfaces with other transport modes, sea, roads and railways. |
(2) |
Rivers in the context of RIS include all inland waterways and ports as defined in Article 2(1) of the RIS Directive. |
(3) |
RIS is also the generic term for all individual information services to support inland navigation in a harmonised way. |
(4) |
RIS collect, process, assess and disseminate fairway, traffic and transport information. |
(5) |
RIS are not dealing with internal commercial activities between one or more of the involved companies, but RIS are open for interfacing with commercial activities. |
2.2. RIS system
For the purpose of RIS, modern river information systems consist of one or more harmonised IT systems. An IT system (information technology system) is the totality of human resources, hardware, software, communication means and regulations in order to fulfil the task of processing information.
2.3. RIS area
The RIS area is the formally described area, where RIS are active. A RIS area may comprise the waterways in a geographical river basin, including the territories of one or more countries (e.g. in a situation where a waterway forms the borderline between two countries) (Figure 2.3).
Figure 2.3.
Relation between RIS area and VTS area
VTS area with VTS centre
RIS area with RIS centre
2.4. RIS centre
A RIS centre is the place, where the services are managed by operators. A RIS may exist without a RIS centre (e.g. an Internet service, a buoys service). When ship/shore interaction in both ways (e.g. by VHF service) is intended, one or more RIS centres are needed. If a VTS centre or a lock exists in a RIS area, they may also be used as RIS centres. It is recommended to concentrate all services in a RIS area into one single RIS centre.
2.5. Inland VTS
Inland vessel traffic services are a service, implemented by a competent authority, designed to improve the safety and efficiency of vessel traffic and to protect the environment. The service should have the capability to interact with the traffic and to respond to traffic situations developing in the VTS area.
VTS should comprise at least an information service and may include others, such as navigational assistance service, or a traffic organisation service, or both, defined as below:
— |
an information service is a service to ensure that essential information becomes available in time for on-board navigational decision-making, |
— |
a navigational assistance service is a service to assist on-board navigational decision-making and to monitor its effects. Navigational assistance is especially of importance in reduced visibility, or difficult meteorological circumstances or in case of defects or deficiencies affecting the radar, steering or propulsion. Navigational assistance is given in due form of position information at the request of the traffic participant or in special circumstances when deemed necessary by the VTS operator, using technologies such as GNSS/Galileo, |
— |
a traffic organisation service is a service to prevent the development of dangerous vessel traffic situations by managing traffic movements and to provide for the safe and efficient movement of vessel traffic within the VTS area (Chapters 4.5 and 5.3.1). |
Where present, VTS are part of river information services (Figure 2.3). Within RIS, Inland VTS belongs to the group of traffic management services with the emphasis on information service and traffic organisation (Chapter 4.5 and 5.3.1).
2.6. VTS area
A VTS area is the delineated, formally declared service area of a VTS. A VTS area may be subdivided in sub-areas or sectors.
2.7. VTS centre
A VTS centre is the centre from where the VTS is operated. Each sub-area of the VTS may have its own sub-centre.
2.8. Competent authority
The competent authority as referred to in Article 8 of the RIS Directive is the authority made responsible for safety, in whole or in part, by the government, including environmental friendliness and efficiency of vessel traffic. The competent authority usually has the tasks of planning, arranging funding and of commissioning of RIS.
2.9. RIS authority
The RIS authority is the authority with the responsibility for the management, operation and coordination of RIS, the interaction with participating vessels, and safe and effective provision of the service.
2.10. RIS users
The users of the services can be described in a number of different groups: skippers, RIS operators, lock/bridge operators, waterway authorities, terminal operators, operators in calamity centres, fleet managers, cargo shippers, consignors, consignees, freight brokers, and supply forwarders.
2.11. Levels of RIS information
River information services work on the basis of different information levels. Fairway information contains the data of the waterway only. Traffic information has the information on vessels in the RIS area. Traffic information can be divided into tactical traffic information and strategic traffic information. Traffic information is provided by traffic images.
There are three levels of information:
(1) |
Fairway information (FI) contains geographical, hydrological, and administrative information regarding the waterway (fairway) in the RIS area that is required by the RIS users to plan, execute and monitor a voyage. Fairway information is one-way information: shore to ship or shore to office (users’ office). |
(2) |
Tactical traffic information (TTI) is the information affecting the skipper's or the VTS operator's immediate decisions with respect to navigation in the actual traffic situation and the close geographic surroundings. A tactical traffic image contains position information and specific vessel information of all targets detected by a radar and presented on an electronic navigational chart, and — if available — enhanced by external traffic information, such as the information delivered by an Inland AIS. TTI may be provided on board a vessel or on shore, e.g. in a VTS centre. |
(3) |
Strategic traffic information (STI) is the information affecting the medium and long term decisions of RIS users. A strategic traffic image contributes to the planning decision capabilities regarding a safe and efficient voyage. A strategic traffic image is produced in a RIS centre and delivered to the users on demand. A strategic traffic image contains all relevant vessels in the RIS area with their characteristics, cargoes and positions, stored in a database and presented in a table or on an electronic map. Strategic traffic information may be provided by a RIS/VTS centre or by an office. |
2.12. Vessel tracking and tracing
Vessel tracking means the function of maintaining status information of the vessel, such as the current position and characteristics, and — if needed — combined with information on cargo and consignments.
Vessel tracing means the retrieving of information concerning the whereabouts of the vessel and — if needed — information on cargo, consignments and equipment.
Part of this service can be fulfilled for example by Inland AIS. Other parts can be fulfilled by an electronic ship reporting system.
3. PARTICIPATING VESSELS
(1) |
Vessels navigating in a RIS area shall make use of mandatory services and are recommended to make use as far as possible of the information provided by RIS and relevant services. |
(2) |
Decisions concerning the actual navigation and the manoeuvring of the vessel remain within the responsibility of the skipper. Any information provided by the RIS cannot replace any decision made by the skipper. |
(3) |
Depending on the level of information available and on the requirements of the competent authority, the vessels (except pleasure craft) are recommended to be equipped step by step with (see Chapter 4.8):
|
4. RIS ARCHITECTURE
4.1. General
The idea of the thematic network WATERMAN (Chapter 1(6)) behind the development of the framework architecture for RIS was to translate policy objectives into specifications for application design. The RIS architecture should be defined in such a way that RIS applications will be produced to be efficient, expandable and able to interact with other RIS applications or applications for other modes of transport. RIS architecture development should lead to an integrated environment of RIS applications in a way that the performance, usefulness and efficiency of the applications will be enhanced.
River information services may be developed and redesigned according to Figure 4.1.
Figure 4.1.
RIS development and redesign
DEVELOPMENT
Objectives
OPERATION
are fulfilled by:
Policy makers
define:
Tasks
require:
Services
Functions
Information needs
Regulations
are provided by:
define:
Regional managers
REQUIREMENTS
design:
System engineers
SYSTEMS
Applications (regional)
are supplied by:
DATA
Services providers
produce:
Information
Fairway information
Tactical traffic information
Strategic traffic information
and supplied by:
are used by:
Users
Feedback
Stakeholders
4.2. RIS stakeholders
RIS will be realised and kept operational by a set of cooperating stakeholders. The most important of them are:
4.2.1. Policy makers
Policy makers want the RIS to solve (or diminish) traffic and transport problems. One party of policy makers are the authorities responsible for safety on the waterways. Other policy makers, e.g. organisations of ship owners, want to provide transport/logistical information services to cargo shippers and terminal operators. The different groups of policy makers have their own policy objectives, tasks and ideas about the required services to achieve its objectives. Once the services have been selected, the functions and information needs with their restrictions and interactions for providing these services should be determined.
4.2.2. Regional managers
Regional managers control the RIS applications, e.g. waterway managers of the competent authority, traffic control managers, managers of search and rescue services, ship owners, and cargo shippers. They define requirements for applications with more detailed and accurate descriptions of the services and the functions, regarding local aspects or aspects of man/machine interface.
4.2.3. System engineers
System engineers prepare system specifications and integrate hardware and software components into system components. RIS and VTS suppliers, system integrators, and telecommunication operators will combine the system components into complete systems which enable RIS services.
4.2.4. Service providers
Service providers make and keep RIS operational and therefore they develop, maintain and operate the RIS applications. They control the autonomous applications and, where necessary, they provide the main input into the applications either by themselves or by RIS users.
4.2.5. RIS users
RIS users can be described as a number of different groups: skippers, RIS operators, lock/bridge operators, waterway authorities, terminal operators, operators in calamity centres, fleet managers, cargo shippers, consignors, consignees, freight brokers, supply forwarders.
4.3. RIS objectives
An objective is the description of intention. The objective may also be called the goal or aim. RIS have three main objectives:
(1) |
transport should be safe:
|
(2) |
transport should be efficient:
|
(3) |
transport should be environmentally friendly:
|
These objectives should be met under the constraints that all RIS are supplied in a manner that is reliable, cost efficient and legally sound.
4.4. RIS tasks
River information services support a number of management tasks in inland shipping. These tasks are related to the objectives (Chapter 4.3) and performed in three different ‘arenas’:
— |
transport logistics where parties that cause the transport cooperate with parties that organise the transport (e.g. consignors, consignees, shippers, supply forwarders, freight brokers, fleet owners), |
— |
transport where parties that organise the transport cooperate with parties that execute the transport (e.g. fleet owners, terminal operators, customers), |
— |
traffic where parties that execute the transport (e. g. ship masters and navigators) cooperate with parties that manage the resulting vessel traffic (e.g. traffic manager, competent authorities). |
The tasks are performed by different actors playing their role and being involved in transport objects and transport processes. One actor can be a stakeholder in one or more arenas at the same time. The activities of the actors are combined at transfer points and transfer processes. Figure 4.4.a gives an overview of all the relevant roles (and thus the stakeholders fulfilling these roles) responsible for traffic, transport and transport logistics in inland shipping. The tasks in Figure 4.4.a are also called communal tasks in the sense that individual tasks of the involved roles have to be tuned to each other by mutually informing each other, by negotiation or — in some cases — by passing on directions. This overview is the basis for defining RIS (Source: COMPRIS: RIS architecture, reference model).
Figure 4.4.a.
Figure 4.4.a.
Arenas, roles and management tasks in inland shipping
ROLE
Object managers
TASK
TRANSPORT OBJECT
TRANSPORT PROCESS
TASK
ROLE
Process managers
TRANSFER POINT
TRANSFER PROCESS
TRANSPORT LOGISTICS ARENA
TRANSPORT ARENA
TRAFFIC ARENA
Consignment delivery manager
Consignment management
Materials, products, interests
Trade and exchange
Supply forwarder (& distributor)
Stock manager
Stock management
Warehouse, shelter
Gathering, distribution
Supply chain management
Transport service quality manager
Transport service management
Cargo, load unit, passenger
Journey of cargo, load unit, passengers
Freight broker
Terminal manager
Terminal management
Terminal
Transship, anchor
Transport chain management
Incident management and calamity abatement
Information for law enforcement
Terminal operator (stevedore)
Fleet manager
Fleet management
Vessel
Voyage, rotation
Ship master
Conning skipper
Waterway, port manager
Infrastructure management
Junctions forks
Route choice
Traffic management
Competent authority
VTS-, lock-, bridge-operator
Infrastructure element
Passage, traffic flow
The management tasks allow deriving the following RIS in relation to the objectives, where one RIS service can fulfil one or more management tasks (Table 4.4.b):
Table 4.4.b.
Derivation of RIS
Objectives Chapter 4.3) |
Management tasks (Figure 4.4 a) |
RIS (Table 4.5) |
|
Efficiency |
Transport object related |
Consignment management |
ITL cargo management (5.d) |
Stock management |
|||
Transport service management |
ITL outside the scope of RIS |
||
Terminal management |
ITL terminal management (5.c) |
||
Fleet management |
ITL cargo and fleet management (5.d) |
||
Safety, environmental friendliness, efficiency |
Infrastructure management |
Fairway information service (1) |
|
Statistics (7) |
|||
Waterway charges and harbour dues (8) |
|||
Efficiency |
Transport process related |
Supply chain management Transport chain management |
ITL cargo and fleet management (5.d) |
ITL transport management (5.b) |
|||
ITL inter-modal port and terminal management (5.c) |
|||
ITL voyage planning (5.a) |
|||
Safety, efficiency |
Traffic process related |
Traffic management |
Traffic information (2) |
Traffic management (3) |
|||
Safety, environmental friendliness, efficiency |
All objects and processes |
Incident management and calamity abatement |
Calamity abatement support (4) |
Law enforcement |
Information for law enforcement (6) |
||
ITL = Information for transport logistics () = numbering in Table 4.5 |
The tasks in all RIS arenas are performed by the actors in cycles as shown in Figures 4.4.c and d. Moreover, the tasks may take place on an operational, tactical or strategic level (good examples are the tactical and strategic traffic information levels, defined in Chapter 2.11). This concept allows to draw for each individual task an information processing loop including the actions of the different actors. Every step in the information processing loop can be supported by river information services, which help the actor in his observations, evaluations, decisions, and actions. The information processing loop can be used to define the river information services (Chapter 4.5) and RIS functions (Chapter 4.6). An example for an information processing loop is given in Appendix A (COMPRIS: RIS architecture, information architecture).
|
|
4.5. River information services
A service provides and uses information. It supports the user in achieving an improvement in performance. Services are developed by development projects and initiatives (driven by stakeholders or by technology push). Services are the means for the user to achieve the objectives. The execution of a task can be enhanced by using one or more services.
River information services as identified in Chapter 4.4 are rearranged and subdivided according to Table 4.5.
Table 4.5
River information services
Mainly traffic related
1. Fairway information service (FIS)
a) |
Visual aids to navigation |
b) |
Radiotelephone service on inland waterways |
c) |
Internet service |
d) |
Electronic navigational chart service |
2. Traffic information (TI)
a) |
Tactical traffic information (TTI) |
b) |
Strategic traffic information (STI) |
3. Traffic management (TM)
a) |
Local traffic management (vessel traffic services - VTS |
b) |
Navigational support (NS) |
c) |
Lock and bridge management (LBM) |
4. |
Calamity abatement support (CAS) |
Mainly transport related
5. Information for transport logistics/management (ITL)
a) |
Voyage planning (VP) |
b) |
Transport management (TPM) |
c) |
Intermodal port and terminal management (PTM) |
d) |
Cargo and fleet management (CFM) |
6. |
Information for law enforcement (ILE) |
7. |
Statistics (ST) |
8. |
Waterway charges and harbour dues (CHD) |
Abbreviations in Table 4.5 are used only to provide the connection to Table 4.6.
4.6. RIS functions and information needs
A RIS function is understood as a contribution to a service. The functional decomposition of river information services allows the allocation of information supply to user demand. Table 4.6 shows the connections between services (Chapter 4.5), functions (Chapter 4.6), users (Chapter 4.2.5) and information levels (Chapter 2.11). It also shows that in many cases the same function serves many participants in the transport process. Table 4.6 gives an example as a guide to anybody else and may remind the reader in making his/her own list.
Table 4.6.
Functional decomposition of river information services
No |
RIS service RIS sub-service RIS function |
Information level |
User |
|||||||
Ship master |
VTS operator |
Lock/bridge operator |
Waterways authority |
Terminal operator |
Calamity centre |
Fleet manager |
Cargo shipper |
|||
FIS |
Fairway information service |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision of information on: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FIS.1 |
Geography of the navigation area and their updates |
FIS |
X |
X |
X |
X |
|
X |
X |
X |
FIS.2 |
Navigation aids and traffic signs |
FIS |
X |
X |
X |
X |
|
X |
|
|
FIS.3 |
Water depths contours in the navigation channel |
FIS |
X |
|
X |
X |
X |
X |
|
X |
FIS.4 |
Long time obstructions in the fairway |
FIS |
X |
X |
X |
X |
|
X |
X |
X |
FIS.5 |
Actual meteorological information |
FIS |
X |
X |
|
X |
|
X |
|
|
FIS.6 |
Temporary obstructions in the fairway |
FIS |
X |
X |
|
X |
|
X |
|
X |
FIS.7 |
Present and future water levels at gauges |
FIS |
X |
X |
|
X |
|
X |
X |
X |
FIS.8 |
State of the rivers, canals, locks and bridges in the RIS area |
FIS |
X |
X |
X |
X |
|
X |
|
X |
FIS.9 |
Restrictions caused by flood and ice |
FIS |
X |
X |
X |
X |
|
X |
X |
X |
FIS.10 |
Malfunctions of aids to navigation |
FIS |
X |
X |
|
X |
|
|
|
|
FIS .11 |
Short term changes of lock and bridge operating times |
FIS |
X |
X |
X |
X |
|
|
|
X |
FIS .12 |
Short term changes of aids to navigation |
FIS |
X |
X |
|
X |
|
|
|
|
FIS.13 |
Regular lock and bridge operating times |
FIS |
X |
X |
X |
X |
|
X |
X |
X |
FIS.14 |
Physical limitations on waterways, bridges and locks |
FIS |
X |
X |
X |
X |
|
X |
X |
X |
FIS.15 |
Navigational rules and regulations |
FIS |
X |
X |
X |
X |
|
X |
X |
|
FIS.16 |
Rates of waterway infrastructure charges |
FIS |
X |
|
|
X |
|
|
X |
X |
FIS.17 |
Regulations and recommendations for pleasure navigation |
FIS |
(X) |
|
|
X |
|
X |
|
|
TI |
Traffic information |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TTI |
Tactical traffic information (short term related) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TTI.1 |
Presentation of own vessel's position |
TTI |
X |
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
TTI.2 |
Presentation of other vessels' positions |
TTI |
X |
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
STI |
Strategic traffic information (medium and long term related) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
STI. 1 |
Presentation of fairway information (=FIS) |
FIS |
X |
|
|
X |
|
X |
X |
|
STI. 2 |
Presentation of vessel's positions in large surroundings |
STI |
X |
|
X |
X |
|
X |
|
|
STI.3 |
Medium and long term assessment of traffic situation |
STI |
X |
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
STI.4 |
Presentation of vessel's characteristics |
STI |
X |
|
X |
X |
X |
X |
|
X |
STI.5 |
Presentation of cargo's characteristics |
STI |
X |
|
X |
X |
X |
X |
|
X |
STI.6 |
Presentation of intended destination |
STI |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
STI.7 |
Presentation of information on incidents/accidents in the coverage area |
STI |
X |
X |
|
X |
|
X |
|
|
STI.8 |
Organisation and regulation of traffic flow |
STI |
X |
X |
|
X |
|
|
|
|
TM |
Traffic management |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
VTS |
Vessel traffic services (local) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
VTS.1 |
Presentation of vessel's positions in large scale |
TTI |
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
VTS.2 |
Monitoring of passing and manoeuvring arrangements |
TTI |
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
VTS.3 |
Short term assessment of traffic situation |
TTI |
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
VTS.4 |
Organisation and regulation of traffic flow in RIS coverage area |
TTI |
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
NS |
Navigational support |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NS.1 |
Information to pilots (navigational support) |
TTI |
X |
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
NS.2 |
Information to tug boats (nautical support) |
STI |
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NS.3 |
Information to bunker boats, waste oil removal boats, vessel equipment firms (vessel support service) |
STI |
X |
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
LBM |
Lock and bridge management |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LBM.1 |
Lock/bridge operation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LBM.1.1 |
Presentation of actual status of lock/bridge process |
TTI |
X |
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
LBM.1.2 |
Presentation of short term planning of lock/bridge (ETAs/RTAs of vessels, waiting places, lock/bridge positions) |
TTI |
X |
X |
X |
|
|
|
|
|
LBM.2 |
Lock/bridge planning |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LBM.2.1 |
Provision of ETAs of approaching vessels |
STI |
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
LBM.2.2 |
Provision of information on medium and long term schedule of lock/bridge process |
STI |
|
|
X |
X |
|
|
|
|
LBM.2.3 |
Provision of medium and long term RTAs of vessels |
STI |
X |
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
CAS |
Calamity abatement support |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CAS.1 |
Information on incidents focused on traffic situation |
TTI |
X |
|
|
X |
|
X |
|
|
CAS.2 |
Assessment of the traffic situation in the situation of an incident |
TTI |
|
|
|
X |
|
X |
|
|
CAS.3 |
Coordination of the assistance of patrol vessels |
TTI |
|
X |
|
X |
|
X |
|
|
CAS.4 |
Assessment of the possible effects of the accident on environment, people and traffic |
TTI |
|
|
|
X |
|
X |
|
|
CAS.5 |
Presentation of information to patrol vessels, police boats, fire squad boats |
TTI |
|
|
|
X |
|
X |
|
|
CAS.6 |
Initiation and coordination of search and rescue activities |
TTI |
X |
|
|
X |
|
X |
|
|
CAS.7 |
Taking measures on traffic, environmental and people protection |
TTI |
|
|
|
X |
|
X |
|
|
ITL |
Information for transport logistics/management |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
VP |
Voyage planning |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
VP.1 |
Provision of information on port of destination, RTA at final destination, type of cargo |
STI |
X |
|
|
|
|
|
X |
X |
VP.2 |
Provision of information on and presentation of the fairway network at different scales |
STI |
X |
|
|
|
|
|
X |
X |
VP.3 |
Presentation of lock and bridge opening times and general waiting times |
STI |
X |
|
|
|
|
|
X |
X |
VP.4 |
Presentation of long term weather information |
STI |
X |
|
|
|
|
|
X |
X |
VP.5 |
Presentation of mid and long term prediction of water levels |
STI |
x |
|
|
|
|
|
X |
X |
VP.6 |
Presentation of information on route characteristics with RTAs, ETAs, ETDs at waypoints |
STI |
X |
|
|
|
|
|
X |
X |
VP.7 |
Presentation of information affecting travel information |
STI |
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TPM |
Transport management |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TPM.1 |
Provision and presentation of ETAs of vessels |
STI |
X |
Ship supplier organisation Bunker organisation Repair organisation |
X |
|||||
TPM.2 |
Provision and presentation of voyage plans of vessels |
STI |
X |
X |
||||||
TPM.3 |
Provision of information on free loading space |
STI |
X |
X |
||||||
TPM.4 |
Monitoring of the performance of contracted transports and terminals |
|
Freight brokers Transport service quality managers |
|||||||
TPM.5 |
Monitoring unusual threats (like strikes, fall in water level) for the reliability of transport |
|
||||||||
TPM.6 |
Match the transport and terminal performance with service levels agreed on |
|
||||||||
TPM.7 |
Define adjustments to methods for voyage planning |
|
||||||||
PTM |
Inter-modal port and terminal management |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PTM.1 |
Presentation of actual terminal or port status |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PTM.1.1 |
Presentation of vessels waiting, being loaded/unloaded |
TTI |
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
X |
PTM.1.2 |
Presentation of actual status of terminal process |
TTI |
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
X |
PTM.1.3 |
RTAs of vessels, waiting places, positions |
|
X |
|
|
|
X |
|
|
X |
PTM.2 |
Port or terminal planning |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PTM.2.1 |
ETAs of approaching vessels |
STI |
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
PTM.2.2 |
Medium and long term schedule terminal process |
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
PTM.2.3 |
Medium and long terms RTAs of vessels |
STI |
X |
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
CFM |
Cargo and fleet management |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CFM.1 |
Information on fleet of vessels and their transport characteristics |
STI |
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
X |
CFM.2 |
Information on the cargo to be transported |
STI |
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
X |
ILE |
Information for law enforcement |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ILE.1 |
Cross-border management (immigration service, customs) |
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
ILE.2 |
Compliance with requirements for traffic safety |
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
ILE.3 |
Compliance with environmental requirements |
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
ST |
Statistics |
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
ST.1 |
Transit of vessels and cargo at certain points (locks) of the waterway |
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
CHD |
Waterway charges and harbour dues |
|
X |
|
X |
X |
|
|
|
X |
4.7. RIS applications
RIS applications are regional or dedicated uses of systems under specific requirements: local, functional, process-oriented. RIS application means the provision of river information services through dedicated systems. A single application can use one or more systems to provide a service.
4.8. RIS systems
A wide range of technical systems has been developed for RIS, most of them used for more than one service, function or application (Table 4.8):
Table 4.8.
Relation between services and systems
System |
Service |
|||||||||||||
Fairway information |
Traffic information |
Traffic management |
Calamity abatement support |
Information for transport logistics |
Information for law enforcement |
Statistics |
Waterway charges and harbour dues |
|||||||
Tactical |
Strategic |
Vessel traffic services |
Navigational support |
Lock and bridge management |
Voyage planning |
Transport management |
Inter-modal port and terminal management |
Fleet and cargo management |
||||||
Visual aids to navigation |
x |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Radar reflecting aids to navigation |
x |
|
|
x |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Light signals |
x |
|
|
x |
|
x |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mobile phone (voice and data) |
x |
|
|
|
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
|
x |
GNSS/Galileo for vessel positioning |
|
x |
x |
|
|
|
x |
x |
x |
x |
|
|
|
|
VHF radio |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
|
x |
|
x |
|
|
Internet |
x |
|
|
|
x |
|
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
|
|
x |
Vessel based radar |
x |
x |
|
|
|
|
x |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shore based radar |
|
x |
|
x |
|
x |
x |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shore based CCTV cameras |
|
x |
|
x |
|
x |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Electronic navigational chart |
x |
x |
|
x |
|
x |
x |
x |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vessel tracking and tracing system |
|
x |
x |
x |
|
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
|
x |
Ship reporting system |
|
|
X |
|
|
|
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
5. RECOMMENDATIONS FOR INDIVIDUAL SERVICES
Because technology changes fast, the emphasis is laid more on services and less on technology dependent systems in this Chapter.
5.1. Fairway information service (FIS)
5.1.1. General
(1) |
Traditional means to supply FIS are e.g. visual aids to navigation, notices to skippers on paper, broadcast and fixed telephone on locks. The mobile phone using GSM has added new possibilities of voice and data communication, but GSM is not available in all places and at all times. Tailor-made FIS for the waterways can be supplied by:
These three FIS categories are dealt with in this Chapter. They are mainly based on the current situation, but for example notices to skipper may be supplied also via ENC service in the future. |
(2) |
Types of fairway information are listed in Table 4.6. |
(3) |
Fairway information contains static and dynamic as well as urgent information regarding the fairway. Static and dynamic information should be communicated on a scheduled basis. The urgent information needs to be updated very frequently and/or should be communicated on a real time basis (e.g. by voice VHF or electronic data interchange, Internet, WAP). |
(4) |
Safety related fairway information should be provided by or on behalf of the competent authority. |
(5) |
Fairway information for an international river area should be given by one single dissemination point provided with data from the concerned competent authorities. |
(6) |
Provided safety related data should be certified by the competent authority. |
(7) |
Values should only be given with an indication of the accuracy that can be attached to it. |
(8) |
Fairway information services should be provided through the approved communication tools (e.g. notices to skippers via the Internet or by VHF) and be given tailor-made as much as practicable. |
(9) |
In order to enable navigation in poor visibility by means of radar, the fairway should be equipped with radar reflecting top marks on buoys and beacons and with radar marks in front of bridge piles. The equipment of the fairway for radar navigation is the infrastructure task of radar reflecting aids to navigation. This task is related to, but not part of RIS. Therefore, it is not dealt with in these RIS guidelines. |
5.1.2. Radiotelephone service on inland waterways
(1) |
The radiotelephone service on inland waterways enables the establishment of radio communication for specific purposes by using agreed channels and an agreed operational procedure (service categories). The radiotelephone service comprises five service categories:
Of these five categories, only the first three are important for RIS. The radiotelephone service enables direct and fast communication between skippers, waterway authorities and port authorities. It is best suited for urgently needed information on a real time basis. |
(2) |
The radiotelephone service is based on the following rules and regulations:
|
(3) |
In the service categories ship-to-ship, nautical information and ship-to-port authorities, the transmission of messages should deal exclusively with the safety of human life, and with the movement and the safety of vessels. |
(4) |
Fairway information by voice in the nautical information (shore/ship) service category is recommended to be implemented:
|
(5) |
The urgent and dynamic information to be communicated by voice radio could concern for example:
|
(6) |
The RIS area should be fully covered by the range of the VHF base stations for nautical information. |
(7) |
In the nautical information service category, information may be transmitted ‘to all users’ as:
|
(8) |
It should be possible for the operator in the RIS centre to answer specific questions of skippers on demand and to receive reports from skippers. |
5.1.3. Internet service
(1) |
An Internet service is recommended to be established for the following types of fairway information:
The abovementioned information shall be provided via notices to skippers or via Inland ECDIS for waterways of class Va and above. |
(2) |
A standard vocabulary should be used for the notices to skippers in order to enable easy or automatic translation into other languages. |
(3) |
For a dense and/or extended waterway network, the dynamic information may be organised in interactive databases (content management system) in order to enable easy access to the data. |
(4) |
In addition to the Internet presentation, the notices to skippers may be mailed by:
|
(5) |
In order to facilitate route planning by the skipper, all fairway information needed for a route from port of departure to port of destination may be presented on one page on demand by the user. |
(6) |
Notices to skippers via the Internet or via data exchange between authorities should be communicated in an agreed format in order to enable automatic translation in other languages. |
(7) |
The requirements of the technical specifications for notices to skippers as defined under the RIS Directive shall be fulfilled. |
5.1.4. Electronic navigational chart service (Inland ECDIS)
(1) |
Electronic navigational charts (ENC) as a means of presenting fairway information shall fulfil the requirements of the Inland ECDIS technical specifications as defined under the RIS Directive. |
(2) |
The chart information to be used in Inland ECDIS should be the latest edition of information. |
(3) |
If the ENC is intended to be used in the navigation mode of Inland ECDIS, at least the safety relevant geo-objects should be included into the ENC. The competent authority should verify the safety relevant information in the ENC. |
(4) |
It is recommended to include all geo-objects of the object catalogue of the Inland ECDIS technical specifications into the ENC. |
(5) |
It is recommended to include the water depths to the ENC (depths contours). The water depths may be related to a predefined water level or to the actual water level. |
5.2. Traffic information service
5.2.1. General
Information concerning the traffic situation may be provided in two ways (Chapter 2.11):
(a) |
as tactical traffic information (TTI), using radar and — if available — a vessel tracking and tracing system such as Inland AIS with underlain electronic navigational charts; |
(b) |
as strategic traffic information (STI) using an electronic ship reporting system (e.g. database with ship and cargo data, reports by VHF or other mobile communication facilities — voice and data). |
5.2.2. Tactical traffic information (TTI)
(1) |
Vessels should be equipped with radar in order to monitor all other ships in the close navigational surroundings of the skipper in poor visibility. |
(2) |
A tactical traffic image on board (Chapter 2.11 (2)) should be enhanced at least by displaying the radar information and — if available — Inland AIS vessel information on an electronic navigational chart (ENC). |
(3) |
The integrated display should be in accordance with the requirements for the navigation mode of the technical specifications for Inland ECDIS as defined under the RIS Directive. |
(4) |
In the navigation mode of Inland ECDIS, the vessel's position should be derived from a continuous positioning system of which the accuracy is consistent with the requirements of safe navigation. |
(5) |
The use of a vessel tracking and tracing system (such as Inland AIS) as an additional position sensor for detection of surrounding vessels should fulfil the requirements of the technical specifications for such systems as defined under the RIS Directive. The vessel information should be identified on the tactical traffic image, and other additional information on the vessels should be available. |
(6) |
Tactical traffic information on shore is used also in local traffic management (e.g. VTS centres) (Chapter 5.3.1). |
5.2.3. Strategic traffic information (STI)
(1) |
Strategic traffic information (Chapter 2.11(3)) should be established, when a permanent survey of the shipping situation in the RIS area is needed for medium term and long term decisions (e.g. for the emergency management at flood and ice). |
(2) |
Strategic traffic information can be helpful to the following services:
|
(3) |
For strategic information a ship reporting system (e.g. in connection with a RIS centre) should be established by the competent authority. The system has the task of collecting, verifying and disseminating the reported data. |
(4) |
The STI should be delivered to RIS users (Chapter 2.10) on demand (Chapter 5.5 (7)) taking into account privacy regulations. |
(5) |
Vessel and cargo data should be collected in a database. The database can be filled up by:
|
(6) |
Reports from inland vessels should fulfil the requirements of the technical specifications for Electronic Ship Reporting as defined under the RIS Directive. |
(7) |
A possible composition of data sets for different services like lock and bridge management, calamity abatement support or terminal management is given as an example in Table 5.2.3.
Table 5.2.3. Data set for ship reporting (example)
|
(8) |
A strategic traffic image on shore may be restricted to special types of vessels (e.g. extraordinarily big vessels, vessels with dangerous cargo, special transports, and special tug combinations). |
(9) |
Data interchange should be established between neighbouring authorities. In case of neighbouring authorities in Member States which fall under the scope of the RIS Directive, the data interchange should be done electronically. In other cases and depending on the number of vessels involved, it should be done by telephone, fax, e-mail or electronic data interchange. |
5.3. Traffic management
5.3.1. Local traffic management (vessel traffic services — VTS)
(1) |
Reference is made to the Inland VTS Guidelines of IALA (Chapter 1.3.a). |
(2) |
A VTS centre for local traffic management by means of a tactical traffic image on shore (Chapter 2.11) should be established for the safety of navigation in difficult local situations and the protection of the surrounding human population and infrastructure from potential dangers of shipping. It emphasises on traffic organisation. The difficult local situations may be:
|
(3) |
The tactical traffic image (TTI) is produced by collecting shore-based radar and vessel tracking and tracing information, and displaying the vessel information on an Inland ECDIS based on the technical specifications for Inland ECDIS and inland vessel tracking and tracing systems as defined under the RIS Directive. For a long river stretch and heavy traffic, the TTI may be enhanced by target tracking. |
5.3.2. Navigational support
Navigational support is the generic term for some services to assist inland navigation.
In the traffic arena (Chapter 4.4), navigational support is provided by pilots to prevent the development of dangerous vessel traffic situations on board or in special circumstances on shore. Nautical support is provided by tug boats or boatmen to assist in safe navigation and mooring.
In the transport arena, vessel support services are services given to the skipper by e.g., bunker boats, waste oil removal boats, vessel equipment firms, and repair organisations.
5.3.3. Lock and bridge management
(1) |
RIS should optimise the traffic flow by:
|
(2) |
A vessel tracking and tracing system with a database and appropriate means of communication (e.g. VHF, GSM — voice and data) (Chapter 5.2.3) can support lock and bridge planning. |
5.4. Calamity abatement support
(1) |
Calamity abatement support registers the vessel and transport data at the beginning of a voyage in a RIS centre and updates the data during the voyage. In case of an accident, the RIS centre delivers the data without delay to the emergency services. |
(2) |
Depending on the risk assessment (Table 6.4 point B.2.a), a calamity abatement service may register only certain types of vessels and compositions (Chapter 5.2.3(8)) or all vessels. |
(3) |
It should be the responsibility of the skipper to report the required data (Table 5.2.3). |
(4) |
A ship reporting system with a database and appropriate means of communication should be established (Chapter 5.2.3). |
(5) |
Position and sailing direction of the vessel should be reported:
|
5.5. Information for transport logistics
(1) |
Logistic applications of RIS comprise:
|
(2) |
Voyage planning is the task of the skipper and the vessel owner. Voyage planning comprises the planning of the loading and the draught of the vessel, as well as the planning of the ETA and of possible loading or unloading during the voyage. RIS should support voyage planning by:
|
(3) |
Transport management means the management of the transport chain beyond the scope of navigation driven by freight brokers and transport service quality managers. It is aimed at:
|
(4) |
The competent authorities should design their information systems in a way that the data flow between public and private partners is possible. The standards and technical specifications according to Chapter 1, points 3.e to j shall be used. |
(5) |
Communication and information exchange between private and public partners in RIS for logistic applications should be carried out according to the procedures and technical specifications that are being agreed for RIS. |
(6) |
The competent authorities should provide ample room for logistics applications within the bounds of their possibilities, such as:
The competent authorities should indicate the data structure in use to application builders. |
(7) |
Confidentiality of data exchange in a RIS needs to be ensured in accordance with Article 9 of the RIS Directive. In cases where logistic information is provided by systems operated by a competent authority, this authority should take the necessary steps to ensure the protection of confidentiality of commercial information. When confidential data are provided to third parties, privacy regulations have to be taken into account. |
5.6. Information for law enforcement
Law enforcement ensures that people within a given jurisdiction adhere to the laws of that jurisdiction. RIS supports law enforcement in inland navigation in the fields of:
(a) |
cross-border management (e.g. the movement of people controlled by the immigration service, customs); |
(b) |
compliance with the requirements for traffic safety; |
(c) |
compliance with the environmental requirements. |
6. PLANNING OF RIS
6.1. General
In accordance with Article 4 of the RIS Directive, Member States shall take the necessary measures to implement RIS on inland waterways falling within the scope of Article 2.1 of that Directive. Member States may apply the Directive also to those inland waterways and ports which are not referred to in Article 2.1.
The concerned competent authority usually should provide the necessary expertise and arrange funding to provide the desired levels of technology and expertise to meet the objectives.
6.2. Responsibilities
(1) |
The competent authority has the responsibility — as far as RIS are traffic related — to plan RIS, to commission RIS and to arrange funding of RIS. In case of existing RIS, the competent authority should change the scope of the RIS if circumstances dictate so. |
(2) |
Where two or more governments or competent authorities have a common interest in establishing RIS in a particular area, they may decide to develop common RIS. |
(3) |
Attention should be paid to the possibilities of monitoring and maintaining the desired level of reliability and availability of RIS. |
(4) |
During the planning of RIS, the concerned competent authority should:
|
6.3. Liability
The liability element of compliance with RIS guidance is an important consideration which can only be decided on a case-by-case basis in accordance with national law. Consequently, a RIS authority should take into account the legal implications in the event of a shipping accident, where RIS operators may have failed to carry out their duty competently.
6.4. Planning process
Table 6.4 illustrates the steps to follow when planning for the development and implementation of RIS.
Table 6.4
The planning process for RIS
A. PRELIMINARY INVESTIGATION
1. Description and analysis of the existing and future situation in the area
a) |
Hydrographical, hydrological and meteorological conditions |
b) |
Waterway conditions e.g. dimensions of waterways (locks, bridges, fairways), visibility along fairways, specific constraints (bends, narrows, shoals, narrow and low bridges), navigation patterns, bottlenecks, operating times of locks |
c) |
Current and future traffic and transport situation number of passengers, tons of cargo, kind of cargo, composition of fleet |
d) |
Number, type and impact of accidents including analysis of consequences |
e) |
Legal situation authorities, incident/calamity regulations |
f) |
Regional management and organisational situation e.g. lock operators, harbour and terminal companies |
g) |
Existing RIS systems |
h) |
Other problems in the area, e.g. delays |
2. |
Objectives see Chapter 4.3 |
3. |
Tasks see Chapter 4.4 |
4. |
Services and functions to be provided see Chapter 4.5 and 4.6 |
5. |
Regulations required |
6. |
Requirements for the applications |
7. |
Proposal for decision on further procedure |
B. APPLICATION DESIGN
1. Design of one or more future RIS applications
short description, representation of performance and cost estimation of the potential IT systems
a) |
Design on a functional basis external and internal functions dependant on the local situation |
b) |
Translation of the functional design into a technical design (systems) |
c) |
Definition of equipment needed on vessels and on shore |
2. Evaluation of future RIS applications
a) |
Risk assessment, e.g. types of risks and weighing of risks by pair wise comparison |
b) |
Efficiency of transport by cost/benefit analysis reduction of waiting times for vessels, higher reliability, shorter voyage duration, costs of incidents, accidents and delays |
c) |
Environment impact study if appropriate, for urban areas and the river |
3. Organisational structure of the future RIS applications
a) |
Liability in the legislation and regional legal basis |
b) |
Competent authority for planning and construction |
c) |
RIS authority for operation authority that is carrying out the task |
d) |
Personnel facilities eventually fully automated, training aspects |
6.5. Training
The successful delivery of RIS depends upon competent and experienced personnel to fulfil the responsibilities of a RIS authority. The recruitment, selection and training of suitable personnel are a pre-requisite to the provision of professionally qualified personnel capable of contributing to safe and efficient vessel operations. Such personnel will help to ensure that full regard is given to the diverse tasks inherent in RIS activities.
7. STEPWISE DEVELOPMENT OF RIS
(1) |
An overview of the possible step by step development of the different parts of RIS is given in Table 7. |
(2) |
Because of the widely varying parameters, it is not possible to give general recommendations on RIS solutions for certain circumstances. |
Table 7
Possible stepwise development of the different parts of RIS
(in italics: system tested, but not implemented yet)
Type of service |
Step |
System configuration |
Chapter |
|
1. Fairway information services |
1.1 Voice communication shore/ship |
1 |
Local nautical information by VHF at locks and bridges |
5.1.2 |
2 |
Central nautical information by VHF system with RIS centre |
5.1.2 |
||
1.2 Internet |
1 |
Internet homepage with notices to skippers and water levels, static pages without content management system |
5.1.3(1) |
|
2 |
As No 1, but additionally dynamic pages with content management system |
5.1.3(3) |
||
3 |
E-mail subscription of notices to skippers and water levels |
5.1.3(4) |
||
4 |
On demand, presentation of all fairway information from port of departure to port of destination for route planning on one web page |
5.1.3(5) |
||
1.3 Electronic navigational chart |
1 |
Electronic raster chart (scan from paper chart) |
|
|
2 |
Inland ECDIS in information mode |
5.1.4(1) |
||
2. Traffic information |
2.1 Tactical traffic information (TTI) on board by radar, Inland ECDIS, and vessel tracking and tracing |
1 |
TTI by radar |
5.2.2(1) |
2 |
TTI by radar and Inland ECDIS in navigation mode, only safety relevant objects in the ENC |
5.2.2(2) to (4) 5.1.4(3) |
||
3 |
As No 2, all objects in ENC |
5.1.4(4) |
||
4 |
Inland ECDIS as No 3, additionally with water depths |
5.1.4(5) |
||
5 |
Inland ECDIS as No 1, additionally with vessel tracking and tracing |
5.2.2(5) |
||
2.2 Strategic traffic information by ship reporting system |
1 |
Database at RIS centre, reports via voice GSM, input in RIS centre manually |
5.2.3(5a) |
|
2 |
Database at RIS centre, reports via voice VHF, input in RIS centre manually |
5.2.3(5b) |
||
3 |
Database at RIS centre, initial reports via electronic ship reporting (data GSM), input in RIS centre automatically, position reports via voice VHF |
5.2.3(5c) |
||
4 |
As No 3, add. reports on positions and ETAs via vessel tracking and tracing systems, input in RIS centre automatically |
5.2.3(5d) |
||
5 |
Database at RIS centre, add. electronic data interchange between RIS centres |
5.2.3(9) |
||
3. Traffic management |
3.1 Vessel traffic services (VTS) |
1 |
Shore based radar stations, VTS centre, Inland ECDIS with radar overlay |
5.3.1(1) |
2 |
As No 1, Inland ECDIS with radar overlay and target tracking |
5.3.1(3) |
||
3 |
Inland ECDIS with vessel tracking and tracing information |
5.3.1(3) |
||
3.2 Lock and bridge management |
1 |
Database for lock diary, registration of waiting times, local |
5.3.3(1a) |
|
2 |
As No 1, add. data exchange with other locks |
5.3.3(1b) |
||
3 |
As No 2, add. transmission of waiting times to skippers (support of voyage planning) |
5.3.3(1c) |
||
4 |
Optimising of lock circles by calculation of ETAs/RTAs for a chain of locks, emission of RTAs to skippers, input of positions of vessels by vessel tracking and tracing system |
5.3.3(1d) |
||
4. Calamity abatement support |
4.1 Ship reporting system for certain types of vessels and compositions |
1 — 5 |
System configurations as No 2.2 |
5.4 |
4.2 Ship reporting system for all vessels |
1 — 5 |
System configurations as No 2.2 |
5.4 |
|
5. Voyage planning |
5.1 Fairway information |
1 |
System configurations as Nos 1.1 to 1.3 |
5.5(2) |
5.2 Lock/bridge management, transmission of RTAs and waiting times |
2 |
System configurations as No 3.2.4 |
8. RIS STANDARDISATION PROCEDURES
(1) |
Standardisation of RIS is needed because:
|
(2) |
RIS shall be developed and operated, following agreed standards and technical specifications, such as:
|
(3) |
Technical specifications should be developed in compatibility with the maritime world in order to enable mixed traffic in the estuaries of rivers/sea-river trade. |
(4) |
International organisations being already involved in maritime standardisation should be asked to take into account standardisation developments in the inland waterway sector, such as:
|
(5) |
Those organisations should be invited to participate and cooperate in the development and maintenance of the technical specifications and standards (as it already happens). |
(6) |
The international bodies like UN/ECE; the Central Commission for the Navigation on the Rhine, the Danube Commission and similar bodies in other parts of the world, are asked to either adopt or recommend the technical specifications as defined under the RIS Directive. |
(7) |
The national governments are asked to certify the equipment produced according to the technical specifications as defined under the RIS Directive. |
(8) |
National governments are requested to cooperate in a bilateral or multilateral way to achieve the greatest amount of harmonisation. |
(1) Directive 2005/44/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 September 2005 on harmonised river information services (RIS) on inland waterway in the Community (OJ L 255, 30.9.2005, p. 152).
(2) Results available on CD from the Transport Research Centre (AVV), Rijkswaterstaat, PO Box 1031, 3000 BA Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
(3) The final report of 15 March 2003 on the ARGO test operation with depths information can be downloaded from the web page www.elwis.de under the rubric ‘RIS-Telematikprojekte (ARGO)’.
(4) Information available from the Transport Research Centre (AVV), Rijkswaterstaat, PO Box 1031, 3000 BA Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
(5) Results available from the Transport Research Centre (AVV), Rijkswaterstaat, PO Box 1031, 3000 BA Rotterdam, The Netherlands and www.euro-compris.org.
Appendix
Example of an information processing loop to Chapter 4.4
Task: Lock management
Role: Lock operator
Evaluate
Decide
Evaluate waiting times for approaching vessels
STRATEGIC LEVEL
Long time lock planning
Decide on the estimated reopening and delays
Evaluate the locking situation for the next locking cycle
TACTICAL LEVEL
short time lock planning
Decide on the estimated waiting time
Observe
Act
Observe blockings of neighbouring locks
Evaluate priority of vessels and order of lockage
Decide on priority and lock chamber to be used
Inform skippers on situation on the whole waterway
Observe approaching vessels from both directions
OPERATIONAL LEVEL
Inform skipper of approaching vessels
Observe arriving vessels
Inform skipper to enter the lock