Back to EUR-Lex homepage

EUR-Lex Access to European Union law

Back to EUR-Lex homepage

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search
You are here

Document 62015TN0084

Case T-84/15: Action brought on 18 February 2015 — Laboratorios Thea v OHIM — Sebapharma (Sebacur)

OJ C 118, 13.4.2015, p. 42–43 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

Date of document:
18/02/2015
Date lodged:
18/02/2015
Author:
General Court
Form:
Judicial information
Authentic language:
English
Link
Select all documents mentioning this document
Instruments cited in case law:
Link

13.4.2015   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 118/42

Action brought on 18 February 2015 — Laboratorios Thea v OHIM — Sebapharma (Sebacur)

(Case T-84/15)

(2015/C 118/54)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Applicant: Laboratorios Thea, SA (Barcelona, Spain) (represented by: D. Mallo Saint-Jalmes, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Sebapharma GmbH & Co. KG (Boppard, Germany)

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Applicant: Applicant

Trade mark at issue: Community figurative mark containing the word element ‘Sebacur’ — Community trade mark application No 1 0 5 54  194

Procedure before OHIM: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 18 December 2014 in Case R 2403/2013-1

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

—

Annul the contested decision to the extent that it dismissed the applicant’s request to annul the decision of the Opposition Division and it ordered the applicant to reimburse EUR 550 to Sebapharma GmbH & Co.;

—

Order the losing party to pay the costs.

Plea in law

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.
Top