Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 62025TN0692

Case T-692/25: Action brought on 9 October 2025 – HI v Parliament

OJ C, C/2025/6192, 24.11.2025, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/6192/oj (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, GA, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/6192/oj

Date of document:
09/10/2025
Date lodged:
09/10/2025
Author:
General Court
Form:
Judicial information
Authentic language:
English
Type of procedure:
Staff cases
Applicant:
Official
Defendant:
European Parliament, Institutions
European flag

Official Journal
of the European Union

EN

C series

C/2025/6192

24.11.2025

Action brought on 9 October 2025 – HI v Parliament

(Case T-692/25)

(C/2025/6192)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: HI (represented by: S. Rodrigues and A. Champetier, lawyers)

Defendant: European Parliament

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

—

annul the applicant’s staff report for the year 2023 and the decision to award the applicant zero merit point for the 2023 appraisal exercise;

—

annul, in so far as necessary, the decision of 1 July 2025 rejecting the complaint lodged by the applicant pursuant to Article 90(2) of the Staff Regulations against her 2023 staff report and the decision to award zero merit point;

—

order the defendant to pay all the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on three pleas in law.

1.

First plea in law, alleging a breach of procedural rules:

—

breach of Article 43 of the Staff Regulations and of Article 6(1) of the Internal Rules governing the application of the General Implementing Provisions applicable to Article 43 of the Staff Regulations adopted by the European Parliament on 21 October 2014 (GIP 43) – breach of the right to be heard;

—

breach of Article 5(9) of the GIP 43 – breach of Article 59(1) of the Staff Regulations.

2.

Second plea in law, alleging manifest errors of assessment.

3.

Third plea in law, alleging breach of the duty of care and the principle of good administration - breach of Articles 31(1) and 41(1) of the Charter.

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/6192/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

Top