This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62022TN0442
Case T-442/22: Action brought on 12 July 2022 — PU v European Public Prosecutor’s Office
Case T-442/22: Action brought on 12 July 2022 — PU v European Public Prosecutor’s Office
Case T-442/22: Action brought on 12 July 2022 — PU v European Public Prosecutor’s Office
OJ C 380, 3.10.2022, p. 16–17
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, GA, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
3.10.2022 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 380/16 |
Action brought on 12 July 2022 — PU v European Public Prosecutor’s Office
(Case T-442/22)
(2022/C 380/19)
Language of the case: Greek
Parties
Applicant: PU (represented by: P. Giatagantzidis, lawyer)
Defendant: European Public Prosecutor’s Office
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
— |
annul the contested decisions, namely (a) Decision 015/2022 of 23 March 2022 of the College of the defendant rejecting the complaint of 3 December 2021 against Decision 090/2021 of 8 September 2021 of the College of the defendant, (b) Decision 090/2021 of 8 September 2021 of the College of the defendant, (c) Decision 021/2022 of 30 May 2022 of the College of the defendant and (d) any other related action or omission of the organs of the defendant, |
— |
order the defendant to pay the total amount of EUR 100 000 by way of compensation for the non-material harm suffered, and |
— |
order the defendant to pay the costs. |
Pleas in law and main arguments
In support of the action, the applicant relies on the following pleas in law.
1. |
First plea in law, alleging procedural errors:
|
2. |
Second plea in law, alleging flaws in the grounds of the contested decisions. |
3. |
Third plea in law, alleging manifest error of assessment and exceeding of the limits of discretion. |
4. |
Fourth plea in law, alleging misuse of powers. |