Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 62021TN0752

    Case T-752/21: Action brought on 29 November 2021 — Associação do Socorro e Amparo v EUIPO — De Bragança (quis ut Deus)

    OJ C 37, 24.1.2022, p. 53–54 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    Date of document:
    29/11/2021
    Date lodged:
    29/11/2021
    Author:
    General Court
    Form:
    Judicial information
    Authentic language:
    Portuguese
    Type of procedure:
    Action for annulment
    Defendant:
    European Union Intellectual Property Office
    Link
    Select all documents mentioning this document
    Instruments cited in case law:
    Link

    24.1.2022   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 37/53

    Action brought on 29 November 2021 — Associação do Socorro e Amparo v EUIPO — De Bragança (quis ut Deus)

    (Case T-752/21)

    (2022/C 37/70)

    Language in which the application was lodged: Portuguese

    Parties

    Applicant: Associação do Socorro e Amparo (Lisbon, Portugal) (represented by: J. Motta Veiga, lawyer)

    Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

    Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Duarte Pio De Bragança (Sintra, Portugal)

    Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

    Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

    Trade mark at issue: European Union figurative mark quis ut Deus — European Union trade mark No 9 131 566

    Procedure before EUIPO: Proceedings for a declaration of invalidity

    Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 21 October 2021 in Case R 581/2021-4

    Form of order sought

    The applicant claims that the General Court should:

    —

    uphold the present action and replace the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal with a decision declaring European Union trade mark No 9 131 566 invalid in respect of all goods and services protected by the mark on the basis of Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council, on the grounds that the mark has not been put to genuine use for a continuous period of five years;

    —

    order the defendant to pay the costs and other expenses incurred in the proceedings, including lawyers’ fees the amount of which is to be determined subsequently.

    Plea in law

    Infringement of Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

    Top