Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 62021TN0747

    Case T-747/21: Action brought on 26 November 2021 — Borussia VfL 1900 Mönchengladbach v EUIPO — Neng (Fohlenelf)

    OJ C 37, 24.1.2022, p. 52–53 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    Date of document:
    26/11/2021
    Date lodged:
    26/11/2021
    Author:
    General Court
    Form:
    Judicial information
    Authentic language:
    German
    Type of procedure:
    Action for annulment
    Defendant:
    European Union Intellectual Property Office
    Link
    Select all documents mentioning this document
    Instruments cited in case law:
    Link

    24.1.2022   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 37/52

    Action brought on 26 November 2021 — Borussia VfL 1900 Mönchengladbach v EUIPO — Neng (Fohlenelf)

    (Case T-747/21)

    (2022/C 37/68)

    Language in which the application was lodged: German

    Parties

    Applicant: Borussia VfL 1900 Mönchengladbach GmbH (Mönchengladbach, Germany) (represented by: R. Kitzberger, lawyer)

    Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

    Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: David Neng (Brüggen, Germany)

    Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

    Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant

    Trade mark at issue: EU word mark ‘Fohlenelf’ — EU trade mark No 12 246 898

    Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings

    Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 28 September 2021 in Case R 2126/2020-4

    Form of order sought

    The applicant claims that the Court should:

    —

    annul the contested decision;

    —

    order EUIPO to pay the costs of the proceedings and the costs of the applicant, including the costs incurred in the previous proceedings.

    Pleas in law

    —

    Infringement of Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;

    —

    Infringement of Article 94(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;

    —

    Infringement of Article 97(1)(d) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
    Top