Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 62021TN0323

Case T-323/21: Action brought on 8 June 2021 — Castel Frères v EUIPO — Shanghai Panati (Representation of Chinese characters)

OJ C 310, 2.8.2021, p. 37–37 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

Date of document:
08/06/2021
Date lodged:
08/06/2021
Author:
General Court
Form:
Judicial information
Authentic language:
English
Type of procedure:
Action for annulment
Defendant:
European Union Intellectual Property Office
Link
Select all documents mentioning this document
Instruments cited in case law:
Link

2.8.2021   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 310/37

Action brought on 8 June 2021 — Castel Frères v EUIPO — Shanghai Panati (Representation of Chinese characters)

(Case T-323/21)

(2021/C 310/49)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Castel Frères (Blanquefort, France) (represented by: T. de Haan, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Shanghai Panati Co. (Shanghai, China)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Trade mark at issue: European Union figurative mark (Representation of Chinese characters) — European Union trade mark No 6 785 109

Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 22 March 2021 in Case R 753/2020-5

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

—

set aside the contested decision;

—

order EUIPO and the intervener to bear the costs, including those incurred by the applicant before the Office’s Fifth Board of Appeal.

Plea in law

—

Infringement of Articles 58(1)(a) and 18(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
Top