This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62019TB0616
Case T-616/19: Order of the General Court of 10 July 2020 — Katjes Fassin v EUIPO — Haribo The Netherlands & Belgium (WONDERLAND) (Action for annulment — EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU word mark WONDERLAND — Earlier Benelux word mark WONDERMIX — Relative grounds for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)
Case T-616/19: Order of the General Court of 10 July 2020 — Katjes Fassin v EUIPO — Haribo The Netherlands & Belgium (WONDERLAND) (Action for annulment — EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU word mark WONDERLAND — Earlier Benelux word mark WONDERMIX — Relative grounds for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)
Case T-616/19: Order of the General Court of 10 July 2020 — Katjes Fassin v EUIPO — Haribo The Netherlands & Belgium (WONDERLAND) (Action for annulment — EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU word mark WONDERLAND — Earlier Benelux word mark WONDERMIX — Relative grounds for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)
OJ C 348, 19.10.2020, p. 14–14
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
- Date of document:
- 10/07/2020
- Date lodged:
- 12/09/2019
- Author:
- General Court
- Form:
- Judicial information
- Authentic language:
- German
- Type of procedure:
- Action for annulment - unfounded
- Defendant:
- European Union Intellectual Property Office
- Link
- Select all documents mentioning this document
- Case affecting:
-
- Related EU case-law document 62019TO0616
- Instruments cited in case law:
- Link
- EUROVOC descriptor:
|
19.10.2020 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 348/14 |
Order of the General Court of 10 July 2020 — Katjes Fassin v EUIPO — Haribo The Netherlands & Belgium (WONDERLAND)
(Case T-616/19) (1)
(Action for annulment - EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the EU word mark WONDERLAND - Earlier Benelux word mark WONDERMIX - Relative grounds for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)
(2020/C 348/20)
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: Katjes Fassin GmbH & Co. KG (Emmerich am Rhein, Germany) (represented by: T. Schmitz and M. Breuer, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: A. Söder, acting as Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO intervening before the General Court: Haribo The Netherlands & Belgium BV (Breda, Netherlands) (represented by: A. Tiemann and C. Elkemann, lawyers)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 8 July 2019 (Case R 2164/2018-4) relating to opposition proceedings between Haribo The Netherlands & Belgium and Katjes Fassin.
Operative part of the order
|
1. |
The action is dismissed as manifestly lacking any foundation in law. |
|
2. |
Katjes Fassin GmbH & Co. KG shall pay its own costs and those incurred, in connection with the present proceedings, by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) and by Haribo The Netherlands & Belgium BV. |
