Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 62018TN0372

    Case T-372/18: Action brought on 20 June 2018 — Colombani v EEAS

    OJ C 319, 10.9.2018, p. 16–16 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    Date of document:
    20/06/2018
    Date lodged:
    20/06/2018
    Author:
    General Court
    Form:
    Judicial information
    Authentic language:
    French
    Type of procedure:
    Staff cases
    Link
    Select all documents mentioning this document
    Instruments cited in case law:
    Link

    10.9.2018   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 319/16

    Action brought on 20 June 2018 — Colombani v EEAS

    (Case T-372/18)

    (2018/C 319/19)

    Language of the case: French

    Parties

    Applicant: Jean-Marc Colombani (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by N. de Montigny, lawyer)

    Defendant: European External Action Service.

    Form of order sought

    The applicant claims that the Court should:

    —

    annul the decision of the EEAS Director General for Budget and Administration of 9 November 2017 (ADMIN(2017)21) establishing the list of officials promoted in the 2017 promotion exercise in so far as it does not contain the applicant’s name;

    —

    order the defendant to pay the costs.

    Pleas in law and main arguments

    In support of the action, the applicant relies on four pleas in law.

    1.

    First plea in law, alleging illegality in respect of the general implementing provisions applied by the EEAS to the promotion procedure

    2.

    Second plea in law, alleging maladministration, failure to comply with the procedure prior to the adoption of the list of officials proposed for promotion and unequal treatment.

    3.

    Third plea in law, alleging infringement of the general implementing provisions of the EEAS relating to Article 45 of the Staff Regulations.

    4.

    Fourth plea in law, alleging a manifest error of assessment of the applicant’s merits and unequal treatment in the assessment of the seniority criterion.
    Top