Back to EUR-Lex homepage

EUR-Lex Access to European Union law

Back to EUR-Lex homepage

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search
You are here

Document 62018TN0354

Case T-354/18: Action brought on 6 June 2018 — KID-Systeme v EUIPO — Sky (SKYFi)

OJ C 268, 30.7.2018, p. 45–46 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

Date of document:
06/06/2018
Date lodged:
06/06/2018
Author:
General Court
Form:
Judicial information
Authentic language:
English
Type of procedure:
Action for annulment
Link
Select all documents mentioning this document
Instruments cited in case law:
Link
201807130602004402018/C 268/553542018TC26820180730EN01ENINFO_JUDICIAL20180606454622

Case T-354/18: Action brought on 6 June 2018 — KID-Systeme v EUIPO — Sky (SKYFi)

Top

C2682018EN4520120180606EN0055452462

Action brought on 6 June 2018 — KID-Systeme v EUIPO — Sky (SKYFi)

(Case T-354/18)

2018/C 268/55Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: KID-Systeme GmbH (Buxtehude, Germany) (represented by: R. Kunze, G. Würtenberger and T. Wittmann, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Sky plc (Isleworth, United Kingdom)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union word mark SKYFi — Application for registration No 12 189 502

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 15 March 2018 in Case R 106/2017-4

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

—

annul the contested decision;

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs of the proceedings.

Pleas in law

—

Infringement of Articles 8(1), 46, 47, 67, 70, 71, 94 and 95 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament;

—

Infringement of Articles 2(2), 7(2), 8(2), 8(9), 27 and 71 of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625.
Top