EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62018TN0186
Case T-186/18: Action brought on 14 March 2018 — Abaco Energy and Others v Commission
Case T-186/18: Action brought on 14 March 2018 — Abaco Energy and Others v Commission
Case T-186/18: Action brought on 14 March 2018 — Abaco Energy and Others v Commission
OJ C 221, 25.6.2018, p. 28–29
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
Case T-186/18: Action brought on 14 March 2018 — Abaco Energy and Others v Commission
Action brought on 14 March 2018 — Abaco Energy and Others v Commission
(Case T-186/18)
2018/C 221/35Language of the case: EnglishParties
Applicants: Abaco Energy, SA (Madrid, Spain), and 1660 others (represented by: P. Holtrop, P. Kuypers and M. de Wit, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission
Form of order sought
The applicants claim that the Court should:
— |
annul European Commission decision C(2017) 7384 final of 10 November 2017 in case SA.40348 (2015/NN) concerning the support for electricity generation from renewable energy sources, cogeneration and waste; ( 1 ) |
— |
order the Commission to issue separate assessments of the previous scheme and the current scheme, in accordance with EU law; |
— |
order the Commission to pay the costs. |
Pleas in law and main arguments
In support of the action, the applicants rely on six pleas in law.
1. |
First plea in law, alleging breach of the Commission’s duty of care.
|
2. |
Second plea in law, alleging a manifest error of fact.
|
3. |
Third plea in law, alleging manifest error of law.
|
4. |
Fourth plea in law, alleging insufficient reasoning.
|
5. |
Fifth plea in law, alleging abuse of power and breach of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights.
|
6. |
Sixth plea in law, alleging breach of the principle of proportionality
|
( 1 ) OJ 2017 C 442, p. 1