Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 62017TN0046

    Case T-46/17: Action brought on 26 January 2017 — TDH Group v EUIPO — Comercial de Servicios Agrigan (Pet Cuisine)

    OJ C 78, 13.3.2017, p. 39–40 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    Date of document:
    26/01/2017
    Date lodged:
    26/01/2017
    Author:
    General Court
    Form:
    Judicial information
    Authentic language:
    English
    Type of procedure:
    Action for annulment
    Link
    Select all documents mentioning this document
    Instruments cited in case law:
    Link

    13.3.2017   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 78/39

    Action brought on 26 January 2017 — TDH Group v EUIPO — Comercial de Servicios Agrigan (Pet Cuisine)

    (Case T-46/17)

    (2017/C 078/54)

    Language in which the application was lodged: English

    Parties

    Applicant: TDH Group (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: D. Chen, lawyer)

    Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

    Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Comercial de Servicios Agrigan, SA (Huesca, Spain)

    Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

    Applicant: Applicant

    Trade mark at issue: International registration designating the European Union No 1 203 373 in respect of figurative mark containing the word elements ‘Pet Cuisine’

    Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

    Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 10 November 2016 in Case R 685/2016-2

    Form of order sought

    The applicant claims that the Court should:

    —

    annul the contested decision;

    —

    order EUIPO to pay the costs.

    Plea in law

    —

    Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.
    Top