This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62017CN0224
Case C-224/17 P: Appeal brought on 27 April 2017 by Hernández Zamora, SA against the judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) delivered on 17 February 2017 in Case T-369/15: Hernández Zamora, SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office
Case C-224/17 P: Appeal brought on 27 April 2017 by Hernández Zamora, SA against the judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) delivered on 17 February 2017 in Case T-369/15: Hernández Zamora, SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office
Case C-224/17 P: Appeal brought on 27 April 2017 by Hernández Zamora, SA against the judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) delivered on 17 February 2017 in Case T-369/15: Hernández Zamora, SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office
OJ C 412, 4.12.2017, p. 11–11
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
- Date of document:
- 27/04/2017
- Date lodged:
- 27/04/2017
- Author:
- Court of Justice
- Form:
- Judicial information
- Authentic language:
- English
- Type of procedure:
- Appeal - inadmissible, Appeal - unfounded, Action for annulment
- Link
- Select all documents mentioning this document
- Case affecting:
-
- Request to review the judgment 62015TJ0369
- Instruments cited in case law:
- Link
- EUROVOC descriptor:
Case C-224/17 P: Appeal brought on 27 April 2017 by Hernández Zamora, SA against the judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) delivered on 17 February 2017 in Case T-369/15: Hernández Zamora, SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office
Appeal brought on 27 April 2017 by Hernández Zamora, SA against the judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) delivered on 17 February 2017 in Case T-369/15: Hernández Zamora, SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office
(Case C-224/17 P)
2017/C 412/18Language of the case: EnglishParties
Appellant: Hernández Zamora, SA (represented by: J.L. Rivas Zurdo, abogado)
Other parties to the proceedings: European Union Intellectual Property Office, Rosen Tantau KG
By order of 19 October 2017 the Court of Justice (Seventh Chamber) held that the appeal was inadmissible.
