EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62016TN0198
Case T-198/16: Action brought on 1 May 2016 — Interbank Deposit Protection Fund v Commission
Case T-198/16: Action brought on 1 May 2016 — Interbank Deposit Protection Fund v Commission
Case T-198/16: Action brought on 1 May 2016 — Interbank Deposit Protection Fund v Commission
OJ C 222, 20.6.2016, p. 33–34
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
- Date of document:
- 01/05/2016
- Date lodged:
- 01/05/2016
- Author:
- General Court
- Form:
- Judicial information
- Authentic language:
- Italian
- Type of procedure:
- Action for annulment
- Link
- Select all documents mentioning this document
- Instruments cited in case law:
- Link
|
20.6.2016 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 222/33 |
Action brought on 1 May 2016 — Interbank Deposit Protection Fund v Commission
(Case T-198/16)
(2016/C 222/41)
Language of the case: Italian
Parties
Applicant: Interbank Deposit Protection Fund (Rome, Italy) (represented by: M. Siragusa, G. Scassellati Sforzolini and G. Faella, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
|
— |
annul European Commission Decision C(2015) 9526 final of 23 December 2015 on the State aid SA.39451 (2015/C) (ex 2015/NN); |
|
— |
in the alternative, annul that decision in so far as it concerns the assessment and classification of the aid element inherent in measure 3; |
|
— |
order the Commission to pay the costs; |
|
— |
order any other measure, including any measure of inquiry, which it deems appropriate. |
Pleas in law and main arguments
The decision contested in the present action is the same one contested in Case T-98/16, Italy v Commission, and Case T-196/16, Banca Tercas v Commission.
The pleas in law and main arguments are similar to those relied on in those two cases.
