EUR-Lex Access to European Union law

Back to EUR-Lex homepage

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62016TB0916

Case T-916/16: Order of the General Court of 23 April 2018 — Winkler v Commission (Civil service — Officials — Transfer of national pension rights — Proposal concerning additional pensionable years — Measure not open to challenge — Act not having an adverse effect — Manifest inadmissibility)

OJ C 221, 25.6.2018, p. 25–25 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

201806080151931282018/C 221/309162016TC22120180625EN01ENINFO_JUDICIAL20180423252511

Case T-916/16: Order of the General Court of 23 April 2018 — Winkler v Commission (Civil service — Officials — Transfer of national pension rights — Proposal concerning additional pensionable years — Measure not open to challenge — Act not having an adverse effect — Manifest inadmissibility)

Top

C2212018EN2510120180423EN0030251251

Order of the General Court of 23 April 2018 — Winkler v Commission

(Case T-916/16) ( 1 )

‛(Civil service — Officials — Transfer of national pension rights — Proposal concerning additional pensionable years — Measure not open to challenge — Act not having an adverse effect — Manifest inadmissibility)’

2018/C 221/30Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Bernd Winkler (Grange, Ireland) (represented by: A. Kässens, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: T. Bohr and L. Radu Bouyon, acting as Agents)

Re:

ACTION based on Article 270 TFEU and seeking, first, annulment of the Commission note of 20 April 2016 on a proposal concerning the additional pensionable years to be taken into consideration in the European Union pension scheme, following a request for transfer of pension rights acquired by the applicant before entering the service of the Union and, secondly, to obtain compensation for the damage allegedly suffered by the applicant as a result of the unlawful acts allegedly committed by the Commission when processing that request for transfer.

Operative part of the order

1.

The action is dismissed.

2.

Bernd Winkler is ordered to pay the costs.


( 1 ) OJ C 46, 13.2.2017.

Top