Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 62016CN0274

    Case C-274/16: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Düsseldorf (Germany) lodged on 13 May 2016 — flightright GmbH v Air Nostrum, Líneas Aéreas del Mediterráneo SA

    OJ C 343, 19.9.2016, p. 22–22 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    Date of document:
    13/05/2016
    Date lodged:
    13/05/2016
    Author:
    Court of Justice
    Form:
    Judicial information
    Authentic language:
    German
    Type of procedure:
    Reference for a preliminary ruling
    Link
    Select all documents mentioning this document
    Case affecting:
    • Submits a preliminary question about 32012R1215 article 7 paragraph 1 point (a)
    Link

    19.9.2016   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 343/22

    Request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Düsseldorf (Germany) lodged on 13 May 2016 — flightright GmbH v Air Nostrum, Líneas Aéreas del Mediterráneo SA

    (Case C-274/16)

    (2016/C 343/33)

    Language of the case: German

    Referring court

    Amtsgericht Düsseldorf

    Parties to the main proceedings

    Applicant: flightright GmbH

    Defendant: Air Nostrum, Líneas Aéreas del Mediterráneo SA

    Question referred

    In the case where passengers are transported on a flight which consists of two connecting flights without any significant stopover at the connecting airport, is the place of arrival of the second leg of the journey to be regarded as being the place of performance under Article 7(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 1215/2012 (1) in the case where the claim which has been brought is directed against the air carrier which operated the first leg of the journey on which the irregularity took place and transport on the second leg of the journey was carried out by a different air carrier?

    (1)  Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2012 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters (OJ 2012 L 351, p. 1).

    Top