Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62015TN0186

    Case T-186/15: Action brought on 14 April 2015 — CSTP Azienda della Mobilità v Commission

    OJ C 190, 8.6.2015, p. 29–29 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    8.6.2015   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 190/29


    Action brought on 14 April 2015 — CSTP Azienda della Mobilità v Commission

    (Case T-186/15)

    (2015/C 190/32)

    Language of the case: Italian

    Parties

    Applicant: CSTP Azienda della Mobilità SpA (Salerno, Italy) (represented by: G. Capo and L. Visone, lawyers)

    Defendant: European Commission

    Form of order sought

    The applicant claims that the Court should:

    annul the decision of the European Commission of 19 January 2015 on State aid SA.35842 (2014/C) (ex 2012/NN), notified to the applicant on 19 February 2015, implemented by Italy;

    declare, in accordance with Article 263 TFEU and Article 264 TFEU, that the Commission’s decision of 19 January 2015 in the proceedings relating to State aid SA.35842 (2014/C) (ex 2012/NN) (for EUR 4 9 51  838) is entirely null and void in so far as it states that the sums awarded by way of compensation for public service obligations within the meaning of Regulation (EEC) No 1191/69, granted under Article 11 of that regulation in respect of tariff obligations in the Local Public Transport sector, could be deemed a non-notified measure constituting State aid under Article 107(1) TFEU which is incompatible with the internal market;

    declare, in accordance with Article 263 TFEU and Article 264 TFEU, that the Commission’s decision of 19 January 2015 in the proceedings relating to State aid SA.35842 is entirely null and void in so far as it lays down operational measures for the recovery of aid paid by the Italian State;

    order the Commission to pay the costs.

    Pleas in law and main arguments

    The pleas in law and main arguments are those relied on in Case T-185/15 Buonotourist v Commission.


    Top