Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 62015FN0064

Case F-64/15: Action brought on 23 April 2015 — ZZ v OHIM

OJ C 221, 6.7.2015, p. 29–29 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

Date of document:
23/04/2015
Date lodged:
23/04/2015
Author:
Civil Service Tribunal
Form:
Judicial information
Authentic language:
German
Type of procedure:
Staff cases

6.7.2015   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 221/29

Action brought on 23 April 2015 — ZZ v OHIM

(Case F-64/15)

(2015/C 221/39)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: ZZ (represented by: H. Tettenborn, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the defendant’s decision of 4 June 2014 to terminate the applicant’s employment contract under one of the terms of that contract.

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

—

annul OHIM’s assessment, notified to the applicant by letter of OHIM of 4 June 2014, according to which the contract of the applicant, as a temporary agent at OHIM, had a notice period of six months beginning on 4 June 2014;

—

order OHIM, in addition, to pay the applicant damages of an appropriate amount to be determined by the Court for non-material loss that the applicant suffered because of OHIM’s abovementioned decision;

—

order OHIM to reinstate the applicant to her position by fully reconstituting the career path that she would otherwise have had if her contract had been continuously renewed and to compensate her the material loss that she suffered, in particular through the payment of all out-standing emoluments and all other material loss that OHIM’s unlawful conduct caused to the applicant (excluding the unemployment benefit that the applicant received);

—

order OHIM, in the alternative, to pay the applicant damages, in the event that on legal or factual grounds the applicant is not reinstated in her position and/or does not continue to work under the previous terms and conditions, for the material loss attributable to the unlawful termination of her contract in the amount corresponding to the difference between the salary that she actually can expect and the salary that she would have received had the contract been renewed, having regard to pension entitlements and other claims;

—

order OHIM to pay the costs.
Top