Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 62015FB0090

    Case F-90/15: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 17 November 2015 — Ayres de Abreu v EESC (Civil Service — Manifest inadmissibility — Representation by a lawyer — Applicant being a lawyer — Impossible for an applicant to be represented by a lawyer who is not a third party)

    OJ C 7, 11.1.2016, p. 37–37 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    Date of document:
    17/11/2015
    Date lodged:
    18/06/2015
    Author:
    Civil Service Tribunal
    Form:
    Judicial information
    Authentic language:
    French
    Type of procedure:
    Staff cases - inadmissible
    Link
    Select all documents mentioning this document
    Case affecting:
    Link

    11.1.2016   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 7/37

    Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 17 November 2015 — Ayres de Abreu v EESC

    (Case F-90/15)

    ((Civil Service - Manifest inadmissibility - Representation by a lawyer - Applicant being a lawyer - Impossible for an applicant to be represented by a lawyer who is not a third party))

    (2016/C 007/49)

    Language of the case: French

    Parties

    Applicant: Antonio Ayres de Abreu (Cascais, Portugal)

    Defendant: European Economic and Social Committee

    Re:

    Application for annulment of the decision not to allow the applicant to retire.

    Operative part of the order

    1.

    The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible.

    2.

    Mr Ayres de Abreu shall bear his own costs.
    Top