EUR-Lex De toegang tot het recht van de Europese Unie

Terug naar de EUR-Lex homepage

Dit document is overgenomen van EUR-Lex

Document 62015CN0148

Case C-148/15: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht Düsseldorf (Germany) lodged on 30 March 2015 — Deutsche Parkinson Vereinigung e.V. v Zentrale zur Bekämpfung unlauteren Wettbewerbs e.V.

OJ C 213, 29.6.2015, blz. 15–16 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

29.6.2015   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 213/15


Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht Düsseldorf (Germany) lodged on 30 March 2015 — Deutsche Parkinson Vereinigung e.V. v Zentrale zur Bekämpfung unlauteren Wettbewerbs e.V.

(Case C-148/15)

(2015/C 213/24)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Oberlandesgericht Düsseldorf

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Deutsche Parkinson Vereinigung e.V.

Defendant: Zentrale zur Bekämpfung unlauteren Wettbewerbs e.V.

Questions referred

1.

Must Article 34 TFEU be interpreted as meaning that a system of fixed prices laid down by national law applicable to prescription-only medicinal products constitutes a measure having equivalent effect within the meaning of Article 34 TFEU?

2.

If the Court answers Question 1 in the affirmative:

Is the system of fixed prices for prescription-only medicinal products justified under to Article 36 TFEU on grounds of the protection of health and life of humans if that system is the only means of ensuring a consistent supply of medicinal products to the population across the whole of Germany, in particular in rural areas?

3.

If the Court also answers Question 2 in the affirmative:

What is the degree of judicial scrutiny required when determining whether the condition mentioned in Question 2 is in fact satisfied?


Naar boven