Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62014TA0813

Case T-813/14: Judgment of the General Court of 18 November 2015 — Liu v OHIM — DSN Marketing (Case for a portable computer) (Community design — Invalidity proceedings — Registered Community design representing a case for a portable computer — Identical earlier designs — Ground for invalidity — Lack of novelty within the meaning of Article 5(1) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 — Disclosure of earlier designs prior to the priority date — Article 7(1) and (2) of Regulation No 6/2002)

OJ C 7, 11.1.2016, p. 28–28 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

11.1.2016   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 7/28


Judgment of the General Court of 18 November 2015 — Liu v OHIM — DSN Marketing (Case for a portable computer)

(Case T-813/14) (1)

((Community design - Invalidity proceedings - Registered Community design representing a case for a portable computer - Identical earlier designs - Ground for invalidity - Lack of novelty within the meaning of Article 5(1) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 - Disclosure of earlier designs prior to the priority date - Article 7(1) and (2) of Regulation No 6/2002))

(2016/C 007/38)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Min Liu (Guangzhou, China) (represented initially by R. Bailly, S. Zhang and Y. Zhang, and subsequently by Y. Zhang, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: A. Folliard-Monguiral, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: DSN Marketing Ltd (Crawley, United Kingdom)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Third Board of Appeal of OHIM of 7 October 2014 (Case R 1864/2013-3), relating to invalidity proceedings between DSN Marketing Ltd and Mr Min Liu.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1.

Dismisses the action;

2.

Orders Mr Min Liu to pay the costs.


(1)  OJ C 65, 23.2.2015.


Top