This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62014TA0635
Case T-635/14: Judgment of the General Court of 21 May 2015 — Urb Rulmenti Suceava SA v OHIM — Adiguzel (URB) (Community trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — Figurative Community trade mark URB — Application for the earlier national mark URB, earlier national collective word mark URB, earlier national collective figurative mark URB and earlier international figurative marks URB — Absolute ground for refusal — No bad faith on the part of the proprietor of the Community trade mark — Article 52(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Relative ground for refusal — No authorisation by the proprietor of the earlier marks — Article 8(1)(b) and Article 53(1)(a) of Regulation No 207/2009 — No infringement of Articles 22(3) and 72(1) of Regulation No 207/2009)
Case T-635/14: Judgment of the General Court of 21 May 2015 — Urb Rulmenti Suceava SA v OHIM — Adiguzel (URB) (Community trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — Figurative Community trade mark URB — Application for the earlier national mark URB, earlier national collective word mark URB, earlier national collective figurative mark URB and earlier international figurative marks URB — Absolute ground for refusal — No bad faith on the part of the proprietor of the Community trade mark — Article 52(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Relative ground for refusal — No authorisation by the proprietor of the earlier marks — Article 8(1)(b) and Article 53(1)(a) of Regulation No 207/2009 — No infringement of Articles 22(3) and 72(1) of Regulation No 207/2009)
Case T-635/14: Judgment of the General Court of 21 May 2015 — Urb Rulmenti Suceava SA v OHIM — Adiguzel (URB) (Community trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — Figurative Community trade mark URB — Application for the earlier national mark URB, earlier national collective word mark URB, earlier national collective figurative mark URB and earlier international figurative marks URB — Absolute ground for refusal — No bad faith on the part of the proprietor of the Community trade mark — Article 52(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Relative ground for refusal — No authorisation by the proprietor of the earlier marks — Article 8(1)(b) and Article 53(1)(a) of Regulation No 207/2009 — No infringement of Articles 22(3) and 72(1) of Regulation No 207/2009)
OJ C 221, 6.7.2015, p. 15–15
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
- Date of document:
- 21/05/2015
- Date lodged:
- 22/08/2014
- Author:
- General Court
- Form:
- Judicial information
- Authentic language:
- English
- Type of procedure:
- Action for annulment - unfounded
- Link
- Select all documents mentioning this document
- Case affecting:
-
- Related EU case-law document 62014TJ0635
- Instruments cited in case law:
- Link
- EUROVOC descriptor:
|
6.7.2015 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 221/15 |
Judgment of the General Court of 21 May 2015 — Urb Rulmenti Suceava SA v OHIM — Adiguzel (URB)
(Case T-635/14) (1)
((Community trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - Figurative Community trade mark URB - Application for the earlier national mark URB, earlier national collective word mark URB, earlier national collective figurative mark URB and earlier international figurative marks URB - Absolute ground for refusal - No bad faith on the part of the proprietor of the Community trade mark - Article 52(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Relative ground for refusal - No authorisation by the proprietor of the earlier marks - Article 8(1)(b) and Article 53(1)(a) of Regulation No 207/2009 - No infringement of Articles 22(3) and 72(1) of Regulation No 207/2009))
(2015/C 221/20)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Urb Rulmenti Suceava SA (Suceava, Romania) (represented by: I. Burdusel, lawyer)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: P. Bullock, Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervening before the General Court: Harun Adiguzel (Diosd, Hungary) (represented by: G. Bozocea, lawyer)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 23 June 2014 (Case R 1974/2013-4) concerning invalidity proceedings between Urb Rulmenti Suceava SA and Mr Harun Adiguzel.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
|
1. |
Dismisses the action; |
|
2. |
Orders Urb Rulmenti Suceava SA to pay the costs; |
|
3. |
Orders Mr Harun Adiguzel to bear his own costs. |
