EUR-Lex Access to European Union law

Back to EUR-Lex homepage

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62014CB0575

Case C-575/14 P: Order of the Court (Second Chamber) of 30 June 2015 — Evropaïki Dynamiki — Proigmena Systimata Tilepikoinonion Pliroforikis kai Tilematikis AE v European Commission (Appeal — Arbitration clause — Contract relating to European Union financial support for a project in the context of the ‘eContent’ programme — Termination of the contract by the European Commission — Payment of amounts not paid and compensation for loss allegedly suffered by the applicant — Distortion of evidence in the file — Appeal manifestly inadmissible in part and manifestly unfounded as to the remainder — Application to amend the decision of the General Court of the European Union on costs — Manifest inadmissibility)

OJ C 294, 7.9.2015, p. 16–17 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

7.9.2015   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 294/16


Order of the Court (Second Chamber) of 30 June 2015 — Evropaïki Dynamiki — Proigmena Systimata Tilepikoinonion Pliroforikis kai Tilematikis AE v European Commission

(Case C-575/14 P) (1)

((Appeal - Arbitration clause - Contract relating to European Union financial support for a project in the context of the ‘eContent’ programme - Termination of the contract by the European Commission - Payment of amounts not paid and compensation for loss allegedly suffered by the applicant - Distortion of evidence in the file - Appeal manifestly inadmissible in part and manifestly unfounded as to the remainder - Application to amend the decision of the General Court of the European Union on costs - Manifest inadmissibility))

(2015/C 294/21)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Appellant: Evropaïki Dynamiki — Proigmena Systimata Tilepikoinonion Pliroforikis kai Tilematikis AE (represented by: M. Sfyri and I. Ampazis, dikigoroi)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: L. Cappelletti and S. Delaude, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the order

1.

Dismisses the appeal,

2.

Orders Evropaïki Dynamiki — Proigmena Systimata Tilepikoinonion Pliroforikis kai Tilematikis AE to pay the costs.


(1)  OJ C 65, 23.2.2015.


Top