This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62013FA0073
Case F-73/13: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 17 March 2015 — AX v ECB (Civil service — ECB staff — Disciplinary proceedings — Disciplinary measure — Dismissal — Rights of the defence — Access to the disciplinary file — Access to information and documents on other divisions — Reasonable time — Lawfulness of the composition of the Disciplinary Committee — Advisory role of the Disciplinary Committee — Stricter disciplinary measure than that recommended — Obligation to state reasons — Management of a division — Manifest error of assessment — Proportionality of the disciplinary measure — Extenuating circumstances — Aggravating circumstances — Objection of illegality)
Case F-73/13: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 17 March 2015 — AX v ECB (Civil service — ECB staff — Disciplinary proceedings — Disciplinary measure — Dismissal — Rights of the defence — Access to the disciplinary file — Access to information and documents on other divisions — Reasonable time — Lawfulness of the composition of the Disciplinary Committee — Advisory role of the Disciplinary Committee — Stricter disciplinary measure than that recommended — Obligation to state reasons — Management of a division — Manifest error of assessment — Proportionality of the disciplinary measure — Extenuating circumstances — Aggravating circumstances — Objection of illegality)
Case F-73/13: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 17 March 2015 — AX v ECB (Civil service — ECB staff — Disciplinary proceedings — Disciplinary measure — Dismissal — Rights of the defence — Access to the disciplinary file — Access to information and documents on other divisions — Reasonable time — Lawfulness of the composition of the Disciplinary Committee — Advisory role of the Disciplinary Committee — Stricter disciplinary measure than that recommended — Obligation to state reasons — Management of a division — Manifest error of assessment — Proportionality of the disciplinary measure — Extenuating circumstances — Aggravating circumstances — Objection of illegality)
OJ C 146, 4.5.2015, p. 43–43
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
4.5.2015 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 146/43 |
Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 17 March 2015 — AX v ECB
(Case F-73/13) (1)
((Civil service - ECB staff - Disciplinary proceedings - Disciplinary measure - Dismissal - Rights of the defence - Access to the disciplinary file - Access to information and documents on other divisions - Reasonable time - Lawfulness of the composition of the Disciplinary Committee - Advisory role of the Disciplinary Committee - Stricter disciplinary measure than that recommended - Obligation to state reasons - Management of a division - Manifest error of assessment - Proportionality of the disciplinary measure - Extenuating circumstances - Aggravating circumstances - Objection of illegality))
(2015/C 146/57)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: AX (represented by: L. Levi, lawyer)
Defendant: European Central Bank (represented by: M. López Torres and E. Carlini, acting as Agents, assisted by B. Wägenbaur, lawyer)
Re:
Application to annul the decision to dismiss the applicant following disciplinary proceedings instigated for serious misconduct and for compensation in respect of the non-material harm allegedly suffered.
Operative part of the judgment
The Tribunal:
1) |
Dismisses the action; |
2) |
Declares that AX is to bear his own costs and orders him to pay the costs incurred by the European Central Bank. |
(1) OJ C 274, 21.9.2013, p. 33.