This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62013CN0564
Case C-564/13 P: Appeal brought on 31 October 2013 by Planet AE Anonymi Etaireia Parochis Symvouleftikon Ypiresion against the order of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) delivered on 9 September 2013 in Case T-489/12 Planet v Commission
Case C-564/13 P: Appeal brought on 31 October 2013 by Planet AE Anonymi Etaireia Parochis Symvouleftikon Ypiresion against the order of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) delivered on 9 September 2013 in Case T-489/12 Planet v Commission
Case C-564/13 P: Appeal brought on 31 October 2013 by Planet AE Anonymi Etaireia Parochis Symvouleftikon Ypiresion against the order of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) delivered on 9 September 2013 in Case T-489/12 Planet v Commission
OJ C 9, 11.1.2014, p. 21–21
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
- Date of document:
- 31/10/2013
- Date lodged:
- 31/10/2013
- Author:
- Court of Justice
- Form:
- Judicial information
- Authentic language:
- Greek
- Link
- Select all documents mentioning this document
- Case affecting:
-
- Annulment request 62012TB0489
- Link
|
11.1.2014 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 9/21 |
Appeal brought on 31 October 2013 by Planet AE Anonymi Etaireia Parochis Symvouleftikon Ypiresion against the order of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) delivered on 9 September 2013 in Case T-489/12 Planet v Commission
(Case C-564/13 P)
2014/C 9/33
Language of the case: Greek
Parties
Appellant: Planet AE Anonymi Etaireia Parochis Symvouleftikon Ypiresion (represented by: V. Christianos, lawyer)
Other party to the proceedings: European Commission
Form of order sought
The appellant claims that the Court should:
|
— |
set aside the order of the General Court delivered on 9 September 2013 in Case T-489/12; |
|
— |
refer the case back to the General Court for it to rule on the substance; |
|
— |
order the European Commission to pay the costs. |
Pleas in law and main arguments
The appellant maintains that the order of the General Court delivered on 9 September 2013 in Case T-489/12 contains findings as to the law which are contrary to the rules of European Union law and challenges them by this appeal.
In the appellant’s opinion, the order under appeal should be set aside, because the court misinterpreted and misapplied European Union law, as regards the content of the interest in bringing proceedings which is required, under European Union law, for the bringing of declaratory proceedings the subject-matter of which is determining a breach of contractual obligations and as regards whether that [interest in bringing proceedings] is vested and present.
