EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62012TB0263
Case T-263/12: Order of the General Court of 14 April 2014 — Manufacturing Support & Procurement Kala Naft v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures against Iran with the aim of preventing nuclear proliferation — Freezing of funds — Res judicata — Obligation to state reasons — Obligation of individual communication — Rights of the defence — Right to effective judicial protection — Right to property — Proportionality — Competence of the Council — Misuse of powers — Error of law — Definition of support given to nuclear proliferation — Error of assessment — Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)
Case T-263/12: Order of the General Court of 14 April 2014 — Manufacturing Support & Procurement Kala Naft v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures against Iran with the aim of preventing nuclear proliferation — Freezing of funds — Res judicata — Obligation to state reasons — Obligation of individual communication — Rights of the defence — Right to effective judicial protection — Right to property — Proportionality — Competence of the Council — Misuse of powers — Error of law — Definition of support given to nuclear proliferation — Error of assessment — Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)
Case T-263/12: Order of the General Court of 14 April 2014 — Manufacturing Support & Procurement Kala Naft v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures against Iran with the aim of preventing nuclear proliferation — Freezing of funds — Res judicata — Obligation to state reasons — Obligation of individual communication — Rights of the defence — Right to effective judicial protection — Right to property — Proportionality — Competence of the Council — Misuse of powers — Error of law — Definition of support given to nuclear proliferation — Error of assessment — Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)
OJ C 194, 24.6.2014, p. 25–25
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
24.6.2014 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 194/25 |
Order of the General Court of 14 April 2014 — Manufacturing Support & Procurement Kala Naft v Council
(Case T-263/12) (1)
((Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures against Iran with the aim of preventing nuclear proliferation - Freezing of funds - Res judicata - Obligation to state reasons - Obligation of individual communication - Rights of the defence - Right to effective judicial protection - Right to property - Proportionality - Competence of the Council - Misuse of powers - Error of law - Definition of support given to nuclear proliferation - Error of assessment - Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law))
2014/C 194/32
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: Manufacturing Support & Procurement Kala Naft Co., Tehran (Tehran, Iran) (represented by: F. Esclatine and S. Perrotet, lawyers)
Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: M. Bishop and R. Liudvinaviciute-Cordeiro, acting as Agents)
Intervener in support of the defendant: European Commission (represented by: É. Cujo and M. Konstantinidis, acting as Agents)
Re:
Application for the partial annulment of Council Regulation (EU) No 267/2012 of 23 March 2012 concerning restrictive measures against Iran and repealing Regulation (EU) No 961/2010 (OJ 2012 L 88, p. 1).
Operative part of the order
1. |
The action is dismissed as manifestly lacking any foundation in law. |
2. |
In addition to bearing its own costs, Manufacturing Support & Procurement Kala Naft Co., Tehran shall pay the costs incurred by the Council of the European Union. |
3. |
The European Commission is ordered to pay its costs. |