Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 62008TJ0200

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 29 September 2010.
Interflon BV v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).
Community trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - Community trade mark FOODLUBE - Absolute grounds for refusal - Descriptiveness - Distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) and (c) and Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(b) and (c) and Article 52(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009).
Case T-200/08.

European Court Reports 2010 II-00210*

ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2010:414

Date of document:
29/09/2010
Date lodged:
22/05/2008
Author:
General Court
Country or organisation from which the request originates:
Netherlands
Form:
Judgment
Authentic language:
English
Type of procedure:
Action for annulment - unfounded, Action for annulment - successful
Applicant:
Individual
Defendant:
EU institutions and bodies, European Union Intellectual Property Office
Judge-Rapporteur:
Soldevila Fragoso
Link
Select all documents mentioning this document
Instruments cited in case law:





Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 29 September 2010 – Interflon v OHIM – Illinois Tool Works (FOODLUBE)

(Case T-200/08)

Community trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – Community trade mark FOODLUBE – Absolute grounds for refusal – Descriptiveness – Distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) and (c) and Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(b) and (c) and Article 52(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

Community trade mark – Surrender, revocation and invalidity – Absolute grounds of invalidity – Registration contrary to Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation No 40/94 (Council Regulation No 40/94, Arts 7(1)(b), and (c) and 51(1)(a)) (see paras 31, 47-48, 61-66)

Re:

ACTION brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 3 March 2008 (Case R 638/2007‑2) concerning invalidity proceedings between Interflon BV and Illinois Tool Works, Inc.

Information relating to the case

Registered Community trade mark of which cancellation sought:

Word mark FOODLUBE for goods in Classes 1 and 4 – Registration No 1647734

Proprietor of the Community trade mark:

Illinois Tools Works, Inc.

Party requesting the declaration of invalidity of the Community trade mark:

Interflon BV

Trade mark of the party seeking cancellation:

The applicant argues that the contested Community trade mark was registered in infringement of Article 7(1)(b) and (c)

Decision of the Cancellation Division:

Application for cancellation dismissed

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Appeal dismissed


Operative part

The Court:

1.

Annuls the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 3 March 2008 (Case R 638/2007‑2) in so far as it dismisses the appeal with regard to chemicals used in industry in Class 1, and industrial oils and greases and lubricants in Class 4;

2.

Dismisses the action as to the remainder;

3.

Orders each party to bear its own costs.

Top