Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 62008CN0366

Case C-366/08: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht München (Germany) lodged on 11 August 2008 — Zentrale zur Bekämpfung unlauteren Wettbewerbs eV v Adolf Darbo AG

OJ C 272, 25.10.2008, p. 12–12 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

Date of document:
11/08/2008
Date lodged:
11/08/2008
Author:
Court of Justice
Form:
Judicial information
Authentic language:
German
Type of procedure:
Reference for a preliminary ruling
Link
Select all documents mentioning this document
Case affecting:
  • request for interpretation 31995L0002 annex 1 L 2 sentence 2
  • request for interpretation 31995L0002 annex 3 paragraph A
Link

25.10.2008   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 272/12

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht München (Germany) lodged on 11 August 2008 — Zentrale zur Bekämpfung unlauteren Wettbewerbs eV v Adolf Darbo AG

(Case C-366/08)

(2008/C 272/21)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Oberlandesgericht München

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Zentrale zur Bekämpfung unlauteren Wettbewerbs eV

Defendant: Adolf Darbo AG

Questions referred

1.

Is the term low-sugar jams in Part A of Annex III to European Parliament and Council Directive 95/2/EC of 20 February 1995 on food additives other than colours and sweeteners (1) to be interpreted as also covering jams named extra jam?

2.

If the answer to Question 1 is affirmative:

a)

How is the term low-sugar jams in Part A of Annex III to Directive 95/2/EC to be interpreted otherwise?

b)

In particular is it to be interpreted as also covering jams named extra jam with a soluble dry matter content of 58 %?

3.

If the answers to Questions 1 and 2(b) are affirmative:

Is the second paragraph of Part II of Annex I to Council Directive 2001/113/EC of 20 December 2001 relating to fruit jams, jellies and marmalades and sweetened chestnut purée intended for human consumption (2) to be interpreted as meaning that the name extra jam can be authorised also in respect of jams which have a soluble dry matter content of less than 60 % where in the case of such jams no less strict requirements are imposed on the name jam?

(1)  OJ 1995 L 61, p. 1.

(2)  OJ 2002 L 10, p. 67.

Top