C-742/18 P
Court of Justice
Status:
In progressCase
on which the appeal is based:
62016TJ0627
DECISION
- Title
- Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 3 September 2020. Czech Republic v European Commission.
Appeal – European Agricultural
Guarantee Fund (EAGF) and European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) – Expenditure excluded from EU financing
– Expenditure incurred by the Czech Republic – Regulation (EC) No 555/2008 – Articles 19 and 77 – Wine market – Regulation
(EC) No 1122/2009 – Article 33 – Support for rural development – Area-related aid – Decoupled direct aid – Cross-compliance
checks – Traditional on-the-spot checks and on-the-spot checks by remote sensing – Burden of proof – One-off and flat-rate
corrections – Doubts concerning the effectiveness of the checks – Risk analysis – Deficiencies. Case C-742/18 P.
- ECLI identifier
- ECLI:EU:C:2020:628
- Applicant
- Czechia
- Defendant
- EU institutions and bodies, European Commission
- Judge-Rapporteur
- Rodin
- Type of procedure
- Appeal - unfounded,Action for annulment,Appeal - successful
- Complementary documents:
-
03/09/2020
PROCEEDINGS
- Title
- Opinion of Advocate General Kokott delivered on 12 March 2020. Czech Republic v European Commission.
Appeal – European Agricultural
Guarantee Fund (EAGF) and European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) – Expenditure excluded from EU financing
– Expenditure incurred by the Czech Republic – Regulation (EC) No 555/2008 – Articles 19 and 77 – Wine market – Regulation
(EC) No 1122/2009 – Article 33 – Support for rural development – Area-related aid – Decoupled direct aid – Cross-compliance
checks – Traditional on-the-spot checks and on-the-spot checks by remote sensing – Burden of proof – One-off and flat-rate
corrections – Doubts concerning the effectiveness of the checks – Risk analysis – Deficiencies. Case C-742/18 P.
- ECLI identifier
- ECLI:EU:C:2020:200
- Advocate General
- Kokott
12/03/2020