92002E3174

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3174/02

by Dorette Corbey (PSE) to the Commission

(7 November 2002)

Subject: Reform of the Common Agricultural Policy

Sustainable development is a priority of the European Union. The protection of biodiversity is a global necessity. Birds have been affected by intensive agriculture. Within the framework of the Commission's proposals for a mid-term review of the CAP, the Commission has increased the importance of biodiversity protection and the maintenance of natural habitat.

1. Does the Commission agree that there is a need to give priority to Pillar II funding to farmers who arrange their agricultural practices in such a way that they benefit species and areas under the Wild Birds and Habitat directives?

2. How will the Commission encourage Member States to give priority in Pillar II activities of farmers who arrange their agricultural practices in such a way that they benefit Special Protection Areas under the Wild Birds and Habitat Directives?

Answer given by Mr Fischler on behalf of the Commission

(17 December 2002)

The Commission is of the opinion that it is necessary to further increase the scope for Member States to encourage the provision of environmental services through agri-environmental schemes under rural development, the second pillar of the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP). Biodiversity protection and the maintenance of natural habitats are a key element of the services that farmers can provide to wider society.

For this reason, the Commission proposed a number of elements to further facilitate the support of these activities under the CAP in its Communication on the Mid-Term Review(1). This included proposing the reinforcement of rural development funding, a higher intervention rate for agri-environmental measures as well as long-term environmental set-aside.

It is up to Member States to decide the focus for increased support within the context of their priorities and needs. With respect to Natura 2000 sites responsibility for ensuring their favourable conservation management lies with the Member States who will need to consider how best to use currently available Community funds to contribute to this objective. As in the past, the Commission will examine any proposed changes to rural development programs within the framework of each Member State's legal commitments.

The financial requirements for the management of the Natura 2000 network is currently subject to consideration by an expert group convened by the Commission. The Commission is committed in its 2003 work programme to submit a Communication on this issue to the Parliament and Council. This will provide the basis for further debate on the long term structure of Community co-financing.

(1) COM(2002) 394 final.