Back to EUR-Lex homepage

EUR-Lex Access to European Union law

Back to EUR-Lex homepage

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search
You are here

Document C2006/294/116

Case T-272/06: Action brought on 29 September 2006 — Evropaïki Dynamiki v Court of Justice

OB C 294, 2.12.2006, p. 57–57 (ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, NL, PL, PT, SK, SL, FI, SV)

2.12.2006   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 294/57

Action brought on 29 September 2006 — Evropaïki Dynamiki v Court of Justice

(Case T-272/06)

(2006/C 294/116)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Evropaïki Dynamiki — Proigmena Systimata Tilepikoinonion Pliroforikis kai Tilematikis AE (Athens, Greece) (represented by: N. Korogiannakis and N. Keramidas, lawyers)

Defendant: Court of Justice of the European Communities

Form of order sought

—

Annulment of the decision of the Court of Justice to evaluate the applicant's bid as not successful and award the contract to the successful contractor;

—

order the Court of Justice to pay the applicant's legal and other costs and expenses incurred in connection with this application, even if the current application is rejected.

Pleas in law and main arguments

By means of its application, the applicant seeks annulment of the decision of the Court of Justice of 20 July 2006, rejecting its bid filed in response to the open Call for Tenders AM CJ 13/04 for the maintenance, development and support of computer applications (OJ 2005/S 127-125162 & 2005/S 171-169521) and awarding the same Call for Tender to another bidder.

The applicant claims that the contested decision was taken in violation of the Financial Regulation (EC) No 1605/2002 (OJ L 248, 16/09/02, p. 1), its Implementing Rules and Directive 2004/18/EC, through an alleged misinterpretation of the selection criteria, violation of the principles of transparency and equal treatment of the participants.

Moreover, the applicant submits that the contracting authority's decision contains evident errors of assessment in the framework of the evaluation of its offer, exceeding, thus, the discretion that European Institutions dispose in procurement procedures.

Top