EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document C2005/155/44
Order of the Court of First Instance of 8 March 2005 in Case T-84/04 Axiom Medical, Inc. v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (Community trade mark — Opposition — Withdrawal of opposition — No need to adjudicate)
Order of the Court of First Instance of 8 March 2005 in Case T-84/04 Axiom Medical, Inc. v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (Community trade mark — Opposition — Withdrawal of opposition — No need to adjudicate)
Order of the Court of First Instance of 8 March 2005 in Case T-84/04 Axiom Medical, Inc. v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (Community trade mark — Opposition — Withdrawal of opposition — No need to adjudicate)
OB C 155, 25.6.2005, p. 22–22
(ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, NL, PL, PT, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
25.6.2005 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 155/22 |
ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
of 8 March 2005
in Case T-84/04 Axiom Medical, Inc. v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (1)
(Community trade mark - Opposition - Withdrawal of opposition - No need to adjudicate)
(2005/C 155/44)
Language of the case: German
In Case T-84/04: Axiom Medical, Inc., established in Rancho Dominguez (United States of America), represented by R. Köbbing, lawyer, against Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM), represented by G. Schneider, acting as Agent, the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM being Paul Hartmann Aktiengesellschaft, established in Heidenheim (Germany), — ACTION for annulment of the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 17 December 2003 (Case R 193/2002-1) relating to opposition proceedings between Axiom Medical, Inc. and Paul Hartmann Aktiengesellschaft — the Court of First Instance (Fourth Chamber), composed of H. Legal, President, P. Lindh and V. Vadapalas, Judges; H. Jung, Registrar, made an order on 8 March 2005, the operative part of which is as follows:
|
1. |
There is no need to adjudicate on the application; |
|
2. |
Each party shall bear its own costs. |