Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document C2006/212/26

    Case C-262/06: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht (Germany) lodged on 15 June 2006 — Deutsche Telekom AG v Bundesrepublik Deutschland

    OB C 212, 2.9.2006, p. 15–15 (ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, NL, PL, PT, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    2.9.2006   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 212/15

    Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht (Germany) lodged on 15 June 2006 — Deutsche Telekom AG v Bundesrepublik Deutschland

    (Case C-262/06)

    (2006/C 212/26)

    Language of the case: German

    Referring court

    Bundesverwaltungsgericht

    Parties to the main proceedings

    Applicant: Deutsche Telekom AG

    Defendant: Bundesrepublik Deutschland

    Questions referred

    1.

    Are the first sentence of Article 27 of Directive 2002/21/EC (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 March 2002 on a common regulatory framework for electronic communications networks and services (Framework Directive) and Article 16(1)(a) of Directive 2002/22/EC (2) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 March 2002 on universal service and users' rights relating to electronic communications networks and services (Universal Service Directive) to be understood as meaning that a statutory requirement provided for under earlier national law for the authorisation of charges for the supply of voice telephony services to end-users by an undertaking with a dominant position in that market, and hence an administrative measure confirming that requirement, should be temporarily maintained?

    If the answer to the first question is in the negative:

    2.

    Does European Community law preclude such extensive continuation?

    (1)  OJ 2002 L 108, p. 33.

    (2)  OJ 2002 L 108, p. 51.

    Top