Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document C2005/115/55

    Case T-108/05: Action brought on 22 February 2005 by Suzy Frederic-Leemans against the European Economic and Social Committee

    OB C 115, 14.5.2005, p. 30–31 (ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, NL, PL, PT, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    14.5.2005   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 115/30

    Action brought on 22 February 2005 by Suzy Frederic-Leemans against the European Economic and Social Committee

    (Case T-108/05)

    (2005/C 115/55)

    Language of the case: French

    An action against the European Economic and Social Committee was brought before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities on 22 February 2005 by Suzy Frederic-Leemans, residing in Lahas (France), represented by G. Vandersanden, L. Levi and A. Finchelstein, lawyers.

    The applicant claims that the Court should:

    1.

    annul the applicant's May 2004 pension statement, so as to apply a correction coefficient at the level of the capital of her country of residence or, at least, a correction coefficient which appropriately reflects the differences in the costs of living in the place where the applicant is deemed to incur her expenditure and therefore complying with the principle of equivalence;

    2.

    order the European Economic and Social Committee to pay all the costs.

    Pleas in law and main arguments

    The pleas in law and arguments relied upon in this case are similar to those invoked in Case T-35/05 Elisabeth Agne-Dapper and Others v Commission.

    Top