Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document C2005/115/41

Order of the Court of First Instance of 10 January 2005 in Case T-209/04 Kingdom of Spain v Commission of the European Communities (Fisheries policy — Detailed rules and arrangements regarding Community structural assistance in the fisheries sector — Request for authorisation for the establishment of joint enterprises — Failure by the Commission to take a decision — Action for failure to act — Action manifestly unfounded)

OB C 115, 14.5.2005, p. 21–22 (ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, NL, PL, PT, SK, SL, FI, SV)

14.5.2005   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 115/21


ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 10 January 2005

in Case T-209/04 Kingdom of Spain v Commission of the European Communities (1)

(Fisheries policy - Detailed rules and arrangements regarding Community structural assistance in the fisheries sector - Request for authorisation for the establishment of joint enterprises - Failure by the Commission to take a decision - Action for failure to act - Action manifestly unfounded)

(2005/C 115/41)

Language of the case: Spanish

In Case T-209/04: the Kingdom of Spain, represented by N. Díaz Abad, lawyer, with an address for service in Luxembourg, against the Commission of the European Communities (Agents: T. van Rijn and S. Pardo Quintillán) — action for failure to act seeking a declaration that the Commission has unlawfully omitted to take a decision on the authorisations requested by the Spanish authorities concerning the establishment of joint enterprises, in accordance with Council Regulation (EC) No 2792/1999 of 17 December 1999 laying down the detailed rules and arrangements regarding Community structural assistance in the fisheries sector (OJ 1999 L 337, p. 10), as amended by Council Regulation (EC) No 2369/2002 of 20 December 2002 (OJ 2002 L 358, p. 49) — the Court of First Instance (Third Chamber), composed of M. Jaeger, President, J. Azizi and E. Cremona, Judges; H. Jung, Registrar, made an order on 10 January 2005, the operative part of which is as follows:

1.

The action is dismissed so far as concerns the requests relating to the vessels Balcagia and Enterprace;

2.

There is no further need to adjudicate on the remainder of the action;

3.

The applicant shall bear the costs.


(1)  OJ C 201 of 7.8.2004.


Top