Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document C2004/201/05

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 24 June 2004 in Case C-212/02: Commission of European Communities v Austria Republic (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Directives 89/665/EEC and 92/13/EEC — Inadequate transposition — Obligation that legislation relating to the award of public contracts provide for a procedure whereby all unsuccessful tenderers may have the award decision set aside)

OB C 201, 7.8.2004 , p. 3–3 (ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, NL, PL, PT, SK, SL, FI, SV)

7.8.2004   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 201/3


JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Second Chamber)

of 24 June 2004

in Case C-212/02: Commission of European Communities v Austria Republic (1)

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Directives 89/665/EEC and 92/13/EEC - Inadequate transposition - Obligation that legislation relating to the award of public contracts provide for a procedure whereby all unsuccessful tenderers may have the award decision set aside)

(2004/C 201/05)

Language of the case: German

Provisional translation; the definitive translation will be published in the European Court Reports

In Case C-212/02, Commission of the European Communities (Agent: M. Nolin, assisted by R. Roniger) v Republic of Austria (Agents: C. Pesendorfer and M. Fruhmann) — application for a declaration that, inasmuch as the Landesvergabegesetze (regional public procurement laws) of the Länder of Salzburg, Styria, Lower Austria and Carinthia do not in all cases provide for a review procedure whereby an unsuccessful tenderer may have an award decision set aside, the Republic of Austria has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 2(1)(a) and (b) of Council Directive 89/665/EEC of 21 December 1989 on the coordination of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to the application of review procedures to the award of public supply and public works contracts (OJ 1989 L 395, p. 33) and of Council Directive 92/13/EEC of 25 February 1992 coordinating the laws, regulations and admnistrative provisions relating to the application of Community rules on the procurement procedures of entities operating in the water, energy, transport and telecommunications sectors (OJ 1991 L 76, p. 14) — the Court (Second Chamber), composed of: C.W.A. Timmermans, President of the Chamber, J.-P. Puissochet (Rapporteur), R. Schintgen, F. Macken and N. Colneric, Judges; M. Poiares Maduro, Advocate General; R. Grass, Registrar, has given a judgment on 24 June 2004, in which it:

1.

Declares that inasmuch as the Landesvergabegesetze (regional public procurement laws) of the Länder of Salzburg, Styria, Lower Austria and Carinthia do not in all cases provide for a review procedure whereby an unsuccessful tenderer may have an award decision set aside, the Republic of Austria has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 2(1)(a) and (b) of Council Directive 89/665/EEC of 21 December 1989 on the coordination of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to the application of review procedures to the award of public supply and public works contracts and of Council Directive 92/13/EEC of 25 February 1992 coordinating the laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to the application of Community rules on the procurement procedures of entities operating in the water, energy, transport and telecommunications sectors;

2.

Orders the Republic of Austria to pay the costs.


(1)   OJ C 180, 27.7.2002.


Top