This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 92002E000883
WRITTEN QUESTION E-0883/02 by Elizabeth Lynne (ELDR) to the Commission. Commission action following the ECJ judgment in Case C-1/00 of 13.12.2001.
WRITTEN QUESTION E-0883/02 by Elizabeth Lynne (ELDR) to the Commission. Commission action following the ECJ judgment in Case C-1/00 of 13.12.2001.
WRITTEN QUESTION E-0883/02 by Elizabeth Lynne (ELDR) to the Commission. Commission action following the ECJ judgment in Case C-1/00 of 13.12.2001.
OB C 205E, 29.8.2002, p. 232–232
(ES, DA, DE, EL, EN, FR, IT, NL, PT, FI, SV)
WRITTEN QUESTION E-0883/02 by Elizabeth Lynne (ELDR) to the Commission. Commission action following the ECJ judgment in Case C-1/00 of 13.12.2001.
Official Journal 205 E , 29/08/2002 P. 0232 - 0232
WRITTEN QUESTION E-0883/02 by Elizabeth Lynne (ELDR) to the Commission (3 April 2002) Subject: Commission action following the ECJ judgment in Case C-1/00 of 13.12.2001 What measures, if any, is the Commission taking following the judgment of 13 December 2001 of the European Court of Justice in Case C-1/00 Commission v France (Failure of a Member State to fulfil its obligations Refusal to end the ban on British beef and veal)? In the light of the continuing illegal French ban on British beef, has the Commission initiated the procedure under Article 228 of the EC Treaty which would lead to its being able to specify the fine that France would have to pay. Answer given by Mr Byrne on behalf of the Commission (7 May 2002) The Commission, not having received satisfactory assurances from the French Government concerning its compliance with the Court's judgement, has opened the procedure under Article 228 of the EC Treaty. The letter of formal notice under the relevant procedure giving France 30 days to submit its observations was sent to that Member State on 21 March 2002. A reply was issued by the French authorities on 19 April and is currently under consideration. The question of a lump sum or penalty payment referred to in Article 228(2) only becomes relevant at a later stage in the proceedings, namely if after failure of the Member State concerned to comply with the Commission's reasoned opinion the Commission brings the case before the Court of Justice. In such a case the Commission is required to specify the amount of the lump sum or penalty which it considers appropriate. The final decision on whether or not to impose the lump sum or penalty and its amount rests with the Court.