This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 92001E001401
WRITTEN QUESTION P-1401/01 by Hervé Novelli (PPE-DE) to the Commission. Compulsory set-aside of 10 % of land.
WRITTEN QUESTION P-1401/01 by Hervé Novelli (PPE-DE) to the Commission. Compulsory set-aside of 10 % of land.
WRITTEN QUESTION P-1401/01 by Hervé Novelli (PPE-DE) to the Commission. Compulsory set-aside of 10 % of land.
OB C 350E, 11.12.2001, p. 144–144
(ES, DA, DE, EL, EN, FR, IT, NL, PT, FI, SV)
WRITTEN QUESTION P-1401/01 by Hervé Novelli (PPE-DE) to the Commission. Compulsory set-aside of 10 % of land.
Official Journal 350 E , 11/12/2001 P. 0144 - 0144
WRITTEN QUESTION P-1401/01 by Hervé Novelli (PPE-DE) to the Commission (3 May 2001) Subject: Compulsory set-aside of 10 % of land Since 1992, arable land has been eligible for Community per-hectare aid under a scheme including set-aside measures. This specific scheme was retained at the time of the most recent agreement in Berlin in 1999 on the new CAP reform. The new regulation has thus continued the downward trend in the intervention price, for which farmers receive compensation at 50 % in the form of area aid. This aid is still subject to a requirement to set aside a proportion of arable land 10 %, or more for producers who wish to do so, within limits set by the Member States (30 % in France). This new reform was intended to guarantee the equilibrium of the market, but the successive BSE and foot-and-mouth crises have shown the limits of the reform and have created a lasting imbalance in the marketing chain for cattle and sheep producers. At the last European agriculture summit, in February 2000, at which no agreement was reached on reforming the beef and veal market, the Commission nevertheless accepted that the Member States could grant national aid to producers so as to compensate them for their losses due to the BSE crisis. Do you not think it is time for the European Union to accept its responsibilities by proposing more flexible set-aside measures to enable producers either to harvest cereals produced on this land or to permit cattle or sheep to graze there? Answer given by Mr Fischler on behalf of the Commission (11 June 2001) By definition, land set aside under the support scheme for arable crops cannot be used for cultivating any agricultural products except for non-food purposes or, in the case of holdings managed under the rules on organic farming, for growing legumes. The crises affecting the sheepmeat and beef industries will not be overcome by allowing grazing on land left fallow. A better approach would be to apply suitable measures put forward under the common organisation of the markets in the sectors concerned. The measures taken by the Commission since late 2000 have already made a significant contribution towards restoring stability on the meat market.