Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document C2006/178/03

    Case C-430/04: Judgement of the Court (Second Chamber) of 8 June 2006 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof, Germany) — Finanzamt Eisleben v Feuerbestattungsverein Halle eV (Sixth VAT Directive — Possibility of relying on the second subparagraph of Article 4(5) — Activities engaged in by a private taxable person in competition with a public authority — Body governed by public law — Treatment as a non-taxable person in respect of activities engaged in as a public authority)

    OB C 178, 29.7.2006, p. 2–3 (ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, NL, PL, PT, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    29.7.2006   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 178/2


    Judgement of the Court (Second Chamber) of 8 June 2006 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof, Germany) — Finanzamt Eisleben v Feuerbestattungsverein Halle eV

    (Case C-430/04) (1)

    (Sixth VAT Directive - Possibility of relying on the second subparagraph of Article 4(5) - Activities engaged in by a private taxable person in competition with a public authority - Body governed by public law - Treatment as a non-taxable person in respect of activities engaged in as a public authority)

    (2006/C 178/03)

    Language of the case: German

    Referring court

    Bundesfinanzhof

    Parties to the main proceedings

    Applicant: Finanzamt Eisleben

    Defendant: Feuerbestattungsverein Halle eV

    Joined party: Lutherstadt Eisleben

    Re:

    Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof — Interpretation of the second subparagraph of Article 4(5) of Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC of 17 May 1977 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes — Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment (OJ 1977 L 145, p. 1) — Taxation of public bodies in respect of activities or transactions in which they engage as public authorities where their non-taxation would lead to significant distortions of competition — Possibility for a taxable private-law association to rely on that provision where it is operating a crematorium in competition with a municipality carrying on a similar activity that is exempt or taxed more advantageously

    Operative part of the judgement

    A private person who is in competition with a body governed by public law and alleges that that body is, in respect of the activities in which it engages as a public authority, treated as a non-taxable person for value added tax purposes or undertaxed is entitled to rely, before the national court, on the second subparagraph of Article 4(5) of Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC of 17 May 1977 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes — Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment in proceedings, such as the main proceedings, between a private person and the national tax authorities.


    (1)  OJ C 300, 4.12.2004.


    Top