This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document C2006/022/25
Case T-346/04: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 24 November 2005 — Sadas v OHIM (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community word mark ARTHUR ET FELICIE — Earlier figurative mark including the word element Arthur — Relative ground of refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94)
Case T-346/04: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 24 November 2005 — Sadas v OHIM (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community word mark ARTHUR ET FELICIE — Earlier figurative mark including the word element Arthur — Relative ground of refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94)
Case T-346/04: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 24 November 2005 — Sadas v OHIM (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community word mark ARTHUR ET FELICIE — Earlier figurative mark including the word element Arthur — Relative ground of refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94)
OJ C 22, 28.1.2006, p. 13–13
(ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, NL, PL, PT, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
28.1.2006 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 22/13 |
Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 24 November 2005 — Sadas v OHIM
(Case T-346/04) (1)
(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community word mark ARTHUR ET FELICIE - Earlier figurative mark including the word element 'Arthur' - Relative ground of refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94)
(2006/C 22/25)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant(s): Sadas SA (Tourcoing, France) (represented by: A. Bertrand, lawyer)
Defendant(s): Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: A. Folliard-Monguiral and G. Schneider, Agents)
Other party or parties to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the Court of First Instance: LTJ Diffusion SA (Colombes, France) (represented by: F. Fajgenbaum and S. Lederman, lawyers)
Action
brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 7 June 2004 (Case R 393/2003-1), concerning opposition proceedings between Sadas SA and LTJ Diffusion SA
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
|
1. |
Dismisses the action; |
|
2. |
Orders the applicant to pay the costs, with the exception of those incurred by the intervener; |
|
3. |
Orders the intervener to bear its own costs. |