This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62023CN0016
Case C-16/23: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale della Liguria (Italy) lodged on 16 January 2023 — FA.RO. di YK & C. Sas v Agenzia delle Dogane e dei Monopoli
Case C-16/23: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale della Liguria (Italy) lodged on 16 January 2023 — FA.RO. di YK & C. Sas v Agenzia delle Dogane e dei Monopoli
Case C-16/23: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale della Liguria (Italy) lodged on 16 January 2023 — FA.RO. di YK & C. Sas v Agenzia delle Dogane e dei Monopoli
OJ C 121, 3.4.2023, p. 6–6
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, GA, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
3.4.2023 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 121/6 |
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale della Liguria (Italy) lodged on 16 January 2023 — FA.RO. di YK & C. Sas v Agenzia delle Dogane e dei Monopoli
(Case C-16/23)
(2023/C 121/09)
Language of the case: Italian
Referring court
Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale della Liguria
Parties to the main proceedings
Appellant: FA.RO. di YK & C. Sas
Respondent: Agenzia delle Dogane e dei Monopoli
Questions referred
|
1. |
Must Article 15 of Directive 2006/123/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2006 on services in the internal market (1) and Articles 49, 56 and 106(2) TFEU be interpreted as precluding national legislation, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, which imposes restrictions on the authorisation of tobacco product outlets according to a minimum geographical distance between providers and according to the resident population? |
|
2. |
Must Article 15 of Directive 2006/123/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2006 on services in the internal market and Articles 49, 56 and 106(2) TFEU be interpreted as precluding national legislation, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, which makes the authorisation of tobacco product outlets subject to compliance with pre-established criteria relating to the minimum geographical distance between suppliers and to the resident population, without allowing the competent public authority to assess other objective factual circumstances that demonstrate, even where the above-mentioned conditions are not satisfied[,] a need for a service in the case at issue? |