Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62021CA0664

    Case C-664/21, Nec Plus Ultra Cosmetics AG: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 2 March 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Vrhovno sodišče Republike Slovenije — Slovenia) — Nec Plus Ultra Cosmetics AG v Republika Slovenija (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Common system of value added tax (VAT) — Directive 2006/112/EC — Article 138(1) — Exemptions for intra-community transactions — Supply of goods — Principles of tax neutrality, effectiveness and proportionality — Compliance with substantive requirements — Time limit for the submission of evidence)

    OJ C 155, 2.5.2023, p. 18–18 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, GA, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    2.5.2023   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 155/18


    Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 2 March 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Vrhovno sodišče Republike Slovenije — Slovenia) — Nec Plus Ultra Cosmetics AG v Republika Slovenija

    (Case C-664/21, (1) Nec Plus Ultra Cosmetics AG)

    (Reference for a preliminary ruling - Common system of value added tax (VAT) - Directive 2006/112/EC - Article 138(1) - Exemptions for intra-community transactions - Supply of goods - Principles of tax neutrality, effectiveness and proportionality - Compliance with substantive requirements - Time limit for the submission of evidence)

    (2023/C 155/20)

    Language of the case: Slovenian

    Referring court

    Vrhovno sodišče Republike Slovenije

    Parties to the main proceedings

    Applicant: Nec Plus Ultra Cosmetics AG

    Defendant: Republika Slovenija

    Operative part of the judgment

    Article 131 and Article 138(1) of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax, read in conjunction with the principles of tax neutrality, effectiveness and proportionality,

    must be interpreted as not precluding national legislation which prohibits the production and gathering of new evidence which establishes that the substantive conditions laid down in Article 138(1) of that directive are satisfied, during the administrative procedure which resulted in the adoption of the tax assessment notice, in particular after the tax inspection stage but before the adoption of that decision, provided that the principles of equivalence and effectiveness have been complied with.


    (1)  OJ C 64, 7.2.2022.


    Top