This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62008TA0070
Case T-70/08: Judgment of the General Court of 9 September 2010 — Axis v OHIM — Etra Investigación y Desarrollo (ETRAX) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community word mark ETRAX — Earlier national figurative marks containing the word elements ETRA I+D — Relative ground for refusal — Admissibility of the appeal before the Board of Appeal — Rule 49(1) of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 and Article 59 of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 60 of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))
Case T-70/08: Judgment of the General Court of 9 September 2010 — Axis v OHIM — Etra Investigación y Desarrollo (ETRAX) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community word mark ETRAX — Earlier national figurative marks containing the word elements ETRA I+D — Relative ground for refusal — Admissibility of the appeal before the Board of Appeal — Rule 49(1) of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 and Article 59 of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 60 of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))
Case T-70/08: Judgment of the General Court of 9 September 2010 — Axis v OHIM — Etra Investigación y Desarrollo (ETRAX) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community word mark ETRAX — Earlier national figurative marks containing the word elements ETRA I+D — Relative ground for refusal — Admissibility of the appeal before the Board of Appeal — Rule 49(1) of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 and Article 59 of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 60 of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))
OJ C 288, 23.10.2010, p. 33–33
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
23.10.2010 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 288/33 |
Judgment of the General Court of 9 September 2010 — Axis v OHIM — Etra Investigación y Desarrollo (ETRAX)
(Case T-70/08) (1)
(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community word mark ETRAX - Earlier national figurative marks containing the word elements ETRA I+D - Relative ground for refusal - Admissibility of the appeal before the Board of Appeal - Rule 49(1) of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 and Article 59 of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 60 of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))
(2010/C 288/62)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Axis AB (Lund, Sweden) (represented by: J. Norderyd, lawyer)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (represented by: A. Folliard-Monguiral, Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Etra Investigación y Desarrollo, SA (Valencia, Spain)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 27 November 2007 (Case R 334/2007-2) relating to opposition proceedings between Etra Investigación y Desarrollo, SA and Axis AB.
Operative part of the order
The Court:
|
1. |
Annuls the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 27 November 2007 (Case R 334/2007-2) relating to opposition proceedings between Etra Investigación y Desarrollo, SA and Axis AB; |
|
2. |
Orders OHIM to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Axis AB. |