This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62008CN0351
Case C-351/08: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundessozialgericht (Germany) lodged on 4 August 2008 — Christian Grimme v Deutsche Angestellten Krankenkasse
Case C-351/08: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundessozialgericht (Germany) lodged on 4 August 2008 — Christian Grimme v Deutsche Angestellten Krankenkasse
Case C-351/08: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundessozialgericht (Germany) lodged on 4 August 2008 — Christian Grimme v Deutsche Angestellten Krankenkasse
OJ C 272, 25.10.2008, p. 11–11
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
25.10.2008 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 272/11 |
Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundessozialgericht (Germany) lodged on 4 August 2008 — Christian Grimme v Deutsche Angestellten Krankenkasse
(Case C-351/08)
(2008/C 272/19)
Language of the case: German
Referring court
Bundessozialgericht
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: Christian Grimme
Defendant: Deutsche Angestellten Krankenkasse
Question referred
Are the provisions of the Agreement between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and the Swiss Confederation, of the other, on the free movement of persons (OJ 2002 L 114, p. 6) (1), in particular Articles 1, 5, 7 and 16 thereof and Articles 12, 17, 18 and 19 of Annex I thereto, to be interpreted as meaning that they preclude a rule which obliges a member of a managing board of a company limited by shares governed by Swiss law who is employed in Germany to be insured in the German statutory pension insurance scheme, whereas members of managing boards of companies limited by shares governed by German law are exempt from that obligation?