This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62011CN0057
Case C-57/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Supremo (Spain) lodged on 7 February 2011 — Vodafone España, S.A. v Ayuntamiento de Tudela
Case C-57/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Supremo (Spain) lodged on 7 February 2011 — Vodafone España, S.A. v Ayuntamiento de Tudela
Case C-57/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Supremo (Spain) lodged on 7 February 2011 — Vodafone España, S.A. v Ayuntamiento de Tudela
OJ C 139, 7.5.2011, p. 13–13
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
7.5.2011 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 139/13 |
Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Supremo (Spain) lodged on 7 February 2011 — Vodafone España, S.A. v Ayuntamiento de Tudela
(Case C-57/11)
2011/C 139/23
Language of the case: Spanish
Referring court
Tribunal Supremo
Parties to the main proceedings
Appellant: Vodafone España, S.A.
Respondent: Ayuntamiento de Tudela
Questions referred
1. |
Must Article 13 of Directive 2002/20/EC (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 March 2002 on the authorisation of electronic communications networks and services (Authorisation Directive) be interpreted as precluding national legislation under which a fee may be required for the right to install facilities on municipal public land from operating undertakings which, without being proprietors of the network, use it to provide mobile telephony services? |
2. |
In the event that the levy is found to be compatible with Article 13 of Directive 2002/20/EC, do the conditions in accordance with which the fee is required under the contested local regulation satisfy the requirements of objectivity, proportionality and non-discrimination laid down in that provision, together with the need to ensure the optimal use of the resources concerned? |
3. |
Is it appropriate to recognise Article 13 of Directive 2002/20/EC as having direct effect? |
(1) OJ L 108, p. 21