Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62025TA0194

Case T-194/25, Scrap-Transporteur: Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber, sitting with five Judges) of 29 April 2026 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof – Germany) – Hauptzollamt A v Scrap-Transporteur (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Excise duties – Excise duty applied to manufactured tobacco – Smoking tobacco – Concept of tobacco capable of being smoked without further industrial processing – Article 5(1)(a) of Directive 2011/64/UE – Scraps of raw tobacco, uncut but threshed and stripped, capable of being processed into water-pipe tobacco through a complex process carried out at home by the consumer)

OJ C, C/2026/3063, 15.6.2026, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2026/3063/oj (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, GA, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2026/3063/oj

European flag

Official Journal
of the European Union

EN

C series


C/2026/3063

15.6.2026

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber, sitting with five Judges) of 29 April 2026 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof – Germany) – Hauptzollamt A v Scrap-Transporteur

(Case T-194/25,  (1) Scrap-Transporteur)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Taxation - Excise duties - Excise duty applied to manufactured tobacco - Smoking tobacco - Concept of ‘tobacco capable of being smoked without further industrial processing’ - Article 5(1)(a) of Directive 2011/64/UE - Scraps of raw tobacco, uncut but threshed and stripped, capable of being processed into water-pipe tobacco through a complex process carried out at home by the consumer)

(C/2026/3063)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Bundesfinanzhof

Parties to the main proceedings

Defendant and appellant on a point of law: Hauptzollamt A

Applicant and respondent in the appeal on a point of law: Scrap-Transporteur

Operative part of the judgment

1.

Article 5(1)(a) of Council Directive 2011/64/EU of 21 June 2011 on the structure and rates of excise duty applied to manufactured tobacco, must be interpreted as meaning that the assessment of whether a product is ‘capable of being smoked’ should not be based on the perception of the public.

2.

Article 5(1)(a) of Directive 2011/64 must be interpreted as meaning that the expression ‘without further industrial processing’ encompasses multi-stage methods that consumers can, however, carry out at home.


(1)   OJ C, C/2025/2568,12.5.2025.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2026/3063/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)


Top