This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62024TA0333
Case T-333/24: Judgment of the General Court of 8 October 2025 – Huda Beauty v EUIPO – Schulz (déjà-vu) (EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU word mark déjà-vu – Genuine use of the mark – Proof of genuine use – Duration of use – Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
Case T-333/24: Judgment of the General Court of 8 October 2025 – Huda Beauty v EUIPO – Schulz (déjà-vu) (EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU word mark déjà-vu – Genuine use of the mark – Proof of genuine use – Duration of use – Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
Case T-333/24: Judgment of the General Court of 8 October 2025 – Huda Beauty v EUIPO – Schulz (déjà-vu) (EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU word mark déjà-vu – Genuine use of the mark – Proof of genuine use – Duration of use – Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
OJ C, C/2025/6174, 24.11.2025, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/6174/oj (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, GA, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
Official Journal |
EN C series |
|
C/2025/6174 |
24.11.2025 |
Judgment of the General Court of 8 October 2025 – Huda Beauty v EUIPO – Schulz (déjà-vu)
(Case T-333/24) (1)
(EU trade mark - Revocation proceedings - EU word mark déjà-vu - Genuine use of the mark - Proof of genuine use - Duration of use - Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
(C/2025/6174)
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: Huda Beauty Ltd (Road Town, British Virgin Islands) (represented by: J. Wachinger and M. Körner, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: M. Eberl, acting as Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Norbert Schulz (Hamburg, Germany) (represented by: S. Rengshausen, lawyer)
Re:
By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 16 April 2024 (Case R 2487/2022-5).
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
|
1. |
Annuls points 1 and 2 of the operative part of the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 16 April 2024 (Case R 2487/2022-5) in relation to the goods in Class 3 ‘perfumery products’; |
|
2. |
Orders EUIPO to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Huda Beauty Ltd; |
|
3. |
Orders Mr Norbert Schulz to bear his own costs. |
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/6174/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)